Psikhologicheskie Issledovaniya • ISSN 2075-7999
peer-reviewed • open access journal
      

 

Guseltseva M.S. Mixed methods of research in the light of the ideal of postnonclassical rationality

Full text in Russian: Гусельцева М.С. Смешанные методы исследований в свете идеала постнеклассической рациональности
Psychological Institute, Moscow, Russia

About author
Suggested citation


Mixed methods and methodology in psychology and social sciences are considered. Conceptual framework of cultural-analytical approach allows us to represent elaboration of mixed research strategies in connection with development of the postnonclassical ideal of rationality in science and ideas of methodological liberalism and pluralism. The logic of science is manifested in movement from pure research lines to the mixed ones, from canons to improvisations, combination of scientific genres and scientific styles play. It is argued that mixed methods and methodologies are a particular case of multi-paradigmality (paradigm pluralism) as a principle of postnonclassical science. The problems of integration of scientific knowledge in this cognitive situation are discussed. It is suggested that intellectual isolationism is the brake to development of Russian psychology and that it is the postnonclassical ideal of rationality depriving the classical heritage and the trustworthiness of the canonical aureole that relieves psychological science for development. The paradox of the postnonclassical ideal of rationality manifests itself in the fact that the waiver of subject boundaries protection strengthens research positions, supports diversity (multeity) and makes scientific development more sustainable.

Keywords: methodology, mixed methods of research, cultural-analytical approach, ideals of rationality

 

Funding
The study was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, project 14-18-00598 «Patterns and mechanisms of positive socialization modern of children and teenagers».


References

Arcidiacono F., De Gregorio E. Methodological thinking in psychology: Starting from mixed methods. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 2008, 2(1), 118–126.

Asmolov A.G., Volodarskaya I.A., Salmina N.G., Burmenskaya G.V., Karabanova O.A. Voprosy psikhologii, 2007, No. 4, 16–23. (in Russian)

Bakhtin M.M. Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva. Moscow: Iskusstvo, 1979. (in Russian)

Bryman A. Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: how is it done? Qualitative Research, 2006, 6(1), 97–113.

Bryman A. Barriers to Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2007, 1(1), 8–22.

Campbell D.T., Fiske D.W. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 1959, 56(2), 81–105.

Chesnokova M.G. Vestnik Moskovskogo gorodskogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. 2012, No. 1(5), 95–106. (in Russian)

Chew G.F. "Bootstrap": A scientific idea? Science, 1968, 161(3843), 762–765.

Creswell J.W. A Framework for Design. In.: J.W. Creswell (Ed.), Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 2003. http://isites.harvard.edu/fs/docs/icb.topic1334586.files/2003_Creswell_A%20Framework%20for%20Design.pdf

Creswell J.W. The Selection of a Research Design. In.: J.W. Creswell (Ed.), Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 2008. http://de.slideshare.net/narf2916/research-design-qualitative-quantitative-and-mixed-methods-approaches-by-jo

De Lisle J. The Benefits and Challenges of Mixing Methods and Methodologies. Caribbean Curriculum, 2011, 18, 87–120.

Denzin N. Sociological methods: A sourcebook. New Brunswick: Transaction publishers, 1970.

Denzin N., Sridhar M.S. Moments, mixed methods, and paradigm dialogs. Qualitative Inquiry, 2010, 16(6), 419–427.

Gaidenko P.P. Nauchnaya ratsional'nost' i filosofskii razum. M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2003. (in Russian)

Garber I.E. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal, 2006, 27(4), 106–113. (in Russian)

Gergen K.J. Toward a Postmodern Psychology. In.: S. Kvale (Ed.), Psychology and Postmodernism. London: Sage Publications, 1994. pp. 7–30.

Guseltseva M.S. Voprosy Psikhologii, 2006, No. 1, 3–15. (in Russian)

Guseltseva M.S. Evolyutsiya psikhologicheskogo znaniya v smene tipov ratsional'nosti (istoriko-metodologicheskoi issledovanie): monografiya. Moscow: Akropol', 2013. (in Russian)

Guseltseva M.S. Voprosy Psikhologii, 2014, No. 2, 81–92. (in Russian)

Hübner K. Istina mifa. Moscow: Respublika, 1996. (in Russian)

Johnson R.B., Onwuegbuzie A.J., Turner L.A. Toward a Definition of Mixed Methods Research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2007, 1(2), 112–133.

Kedrov B.M. Problemy logiki i metodologii nauki. Moscow: Nauka, 1990. (in Russian)

Kimchi J., Polivka B., Stevenson J.S. Triangulation: Operational definitions. Nursing Research, 1991, 40(6), 364–366.

Klochko V.E. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvenno universiteta. 2007, No. 05. http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/postneklassicheskaya-transspektiva-psihologicheskoy-nauki (in Russian)

Kultygin V.P. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2001, No. 8, 21–31. (in Russian)

Kvale S. Postmodern Psychology: A Contradiction in Terms? In.: S. Kvale (Ed.), Psychology and Postmodernism. London: Sage Publications, 1994. pp. 31–57.

Mamardashvili M.K. Novyi krug, 1992, No. 2, 56–73. (in Russian)

Martsinkovskaya T.D. Voprosy psikhologii, 2013, No. 4, 57–68. (in Russian)

Mazilov V.A. In: V.V. Novikov (Ed.), Trudy Yaroslavskogo metodologicheskogo seminara. Metodologiya psikhologii. Yaroslavl: MAPN, 2003. Vol. 1, pp. 205–237. (in Russian)

Morse J. Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation. Nursing Research, 1991, 40(2), 120–123.

Myasoed P.A. Voprosy psikhologii, 2004. No. 6, 3–18. (in Russian)

Olsen W.K. Triangulation in Social Research: Qualitative and Quantitative Methods Can Really Be Mixed. In.: M.Holborn (Ed.), Developments in Sociology. Haralambos: Causeway Press, 2004. http://research.apc.org/images/5/54/Triangulation.pdf

Panchenko A. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2012, No. 113. http://magazines.russ.ru/nlo/2012/113/pa12.html (in Russian)

Porta D. della, Keating M. (Eds.). Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences: A Pluralist Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.

Porta D. della, Keating M. In Defence of Pluralism. Combining approaches in the social sciences. International Congress of Political Science. Santiago de Chile, 2009. http://paperroom.ipsa.org/papers/paper_1051.pdf

Prokhorova I.D. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2009, No. 100, 9–16. (in Russian)

Rabinovich V.L. Alkhimiya kak fenomen srednevekovoi kul'tury. Moscow: Nauka, 1979. (in Russian)

Semenov Yu.I. Etnograficheskoe obozrenie, 1993, No. 6. http://scepsis.net/library/id_133.html (in Russian)

Sergienko E.A. In: T.D. Martsinkovskaya (Ed.), Fenomenologiya sovremennogo detstva. Moscow: Federal'nyi institut razvitiya obrazovaniya, 2012. Vol. 1, pp. 20–50 (in Russian)

Sergienko E.A., Lebedeva E.I., Prusakova O.A. Model' psikhicheskogo kak osnova ponimaniya sebya i drugogo v ontogeneze cheloveka. Moscow: Institut psikhologii RAN, 2009. (in Russian)

Stepin V.S. Voprosy filosofii,1991, No. 8, 129–138. (in Russian)

Stepin V.S. Teoreticheskoe znaniye. Moscow: Progress-Traditsiya, 2000. (in Russian)

Tashakkori A., Creswell J.W. The New Era of Mixed Methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2007, 1(1), 3–7.

Tashakkori A., Teddlie C. Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1998.

Terrell S.R. Mixed-Methods Research Methodologies. The Qualitative Report, 2012, 17(1), 254–280.

Thurmond V.A. The Point of Triangulation. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 2001, 33(3), 253–258.

Tulchinskii G.L. Postchelovecheskaya personologiya. Novye perspektivy ratsional'nosti i svobody. St. Petersburg: Aleteiya, 2002. (in Russian)

Varganova G.V. Bibliosfera, 2009, No. 4. http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/poliparadigmalnost-metodologicheskih-podhodov-v-nauchnyh-issledovaniyah (in Russian)

Vygotsky L.S. In: Sobranie sochinenii. Moscow: Pedagogika, 1982. Vol. 1, pp. 291–436. (in Russian)

Wilber K. Teoriya vsego. Integral'nyi podkhod k biznesu, politike, nauke i dukhovnosti. Moscow: POSTUM, 2013. (in Russian)

Yanchuk V.A. Metodologiya i istoriya psikhologii, 2007, (2)1, 207–227. (in Russian)

Received 24 May 2014. Date of publication: 31 August 2014.

About author

Guseltseva Marina S. Ph.D., Associate Professor, Leading Research Associate, Psychological Institute, ul. Mokhovaya, 9–4, 125009 Moscow, Russia.
E-mail: Этот адрес электронной почты защищен от спам-ботов. У вас должен быть включен JavaScript для просмотра.

Suggested citation

Guseltseva M.S. Mixed methods of research in the light of the ideal of postnonclassical rationality. Psikhologicheskie Issledovaniya, 2014, Vol. 7, No. 36, p. 5. http://psystudy.ru (in Russian, abstr. in English).

Permanent URL: http://psystudy.ru/index.php/eng/2014v7n36e/1026-guseltseva36e.html

Back to top >>

Related Articles