Взаимосвязь целостности группы и эффективности групповой деятельности

Авторы

  • Алексей Климов

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54359/ps.v6i31.670

Ключевые слова:

целостность социальной группы, воспринимаемая целостность, групповая сплоченность, эффективность деятельности

Аннотация

Сопоставляются исследования сплоченности и воспринимаемой целостности группы, проведенные различными авторами в рамках двух подходов к пониманию проблемы групповой целостности. Анализируются причины и последствия возникновения целостности группы. Рассматривается связь этого конструкта с эффективностью групповой деятельности. Предлагаются основания, на которых могут быть соотнесены широко используемые в социальной психологии понятия «групповая сплоченность», «групповая целостность» и «воспринимаемая целостность группы».

Скачивания

Данные скачивания пока недоступны.

Автор

Алексей Климов

Климов Алексей Александрович. Аспирант, кафедра организационной психологии, факультет психологии, Высшая школа экономики (Национальный исследовательский университет), ул. Мясницкая, 20, 101000 Москва, Россия. E-mail: aklimov@hse.ru

Литература

Agadullina E.R. Sovremennaya sotsial'naya psikhologiya: teoreticheskie podkhody i prikladnye issledovaniya, 2010, 2(7), 7–20. (in Russian )

Agadullina E.R. Uchenye zapiski Kazanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta., 2008, 150(3), 7–14. (in Russian)

Agadullina E.R., Kotova M.V. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ser. 14. Psikhologiya, 2012, No. 1, 97–105. (in Russian)

Beal D.J., Cohen R.R., Burke M.J., McLendon C.L. Cohesion and Performance in Groups: A Meta-Analytic Clarification of Construct Relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2003, 88(6), 989–1004. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.6.989

Beal D.J., Cohen R.R., Burke M.J., McLendon C.L. Cohesion and Performance in Groups: A Meta-Analytic Clarification of Construct Relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2003, 88(6), 989–1004. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.6.989

Bell B.S., Kozlowski S.W.J. Three Conceptual Themes for Future Research on Teams. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2012, 5(1), 45–48. doi:10.1111/j.1754-9434.2011.01403.x

Boldry J.G., Gaertner L., Quinn J. Measuring the Measures: A Meta-Analytic Investigation of the Measures of Outgroup Homogeneity. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 2007, 10(2), 157–178. doi:10.1177/1368430207075153

Campbell D.T. Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities. Behavioral science, 1958, 3(1), 14–25.

Carron A.V., Brawley L.R. Cohesion: Conceptual and Measurement Issues. Small Group Research, 2000, 31(1), 89–106. doi:10.1177/104649640003100105

Castano E., Yzerbyt V., Bourguignon D. We are one and I like it: The impact of ingroup entitativity on ingroup identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 2003, 33(6), 735–754. doi:10.1002/ejsp.175

Castano E., Yzerbyt V., Bourguignon D., Seron E. Who May Enter? The Impact of In-Group Identification on In-Group/Out-Group Categorization. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2002a, 38(3), 315–322. doi:10.1006/jesp.2001.1512

Castano E., Yzerbyt V., Paladino M.P., Sacchi S. I Belong, therefore, I Exist: Ingroup Identification, Ingroup Entitativity, and Ingroup Bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2002b, 28(2), 135–143. doi:10.1177/0146167202282001

Chang A., Bordia P. A Multidimensional Approach to the Group Cohesion-Group Performance Relationship. Small Group Research, 2001, 379–405. doi:10.1177/104649640103200401

Chernyshev A.S. In: A.S. Chernyshev (Ed.), Sotsial'no-psikhologicheskie aspekty optimizatsii zhiznedeyatel'nosti molodezhnykh grupp v izmenyayushchikhsya sotsial'no-ekonomicheskikh usloviyakh.. Kursk: Kur. gos. ped. univ., 2000. (in Russian)

Crawford M.T., Salaman L. Entitativity, identity, and the fulfilment of psychological needs. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2012, 48(3), 726–730. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.12.015

Dasgupta N., Banaji M.R., Abelson R.P. Group entitativity and group perception: Associations between physical features and psychological judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology; Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1999, 77(5), 991.

Dion K.L. Group cohesion: From “field of forces” to multidimensional construct. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 2000, 4(1), 7–26. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.4.1.7

Dontsov A.I. Problemy gruppovoi splochennosti. Moscow: Mosk. gos. univ., 1979. (in Russian)

Dontsov A.I. Psikhologiya kollektiva: metodologicheskie problemy issledovaniyaof investigation. Moscow: Mosk. gos. univ., 1984. (in Russian)

Dunlop W.L., Beauchamp M.R. Does similarity make a difference? Predicting cohesion and attendance behaviors within exercise group settings. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 2011, 15(3), 258. doi:10.1037/a0023642

Dyce J.A., Cornell J. Factorial Validity of the Group Environment Questionnaire Among Musicians. The Journal of social psychology, 1996, 136(2), 263–264. doi:10.1080/00224545.1996.9714003

Dymov E.I., Krikunov A.S., Lutoshkin A.N. Voprosy psikhologii kollektiva shkol'nikov i studentov. Kursk, 1972. (in Russian)

Evans C.R., Dion K.L. Group Cohesion and Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Small Group Research, 2012, 43(6), 690–701. doi:10.1177/1046496412468074

Ezquerro A. Cohesion and Coherency in Group Analysis. Group Analysis, 2010, 43(4), 496–504. doi:10.1177/0533316410380837

Fuentes Ávila M. La indagación de los niveles de desarrollo del grupo a través de la metódica N.D. Revista Cubana de Psicología, 1986, 3(1), 17–29.

Gaertner L., Schopler J. Perceived ingroup entitativity and intergroup bias: An interconnection of self and others. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1998, 28(6), 963–980.

Gorbatenko A.S. Voprosy psikhologii, 1982, No. 3, 99–104. (in Russian)

Greer L.L. Group Cohesion: Then and Now. Small Group Research, 2012, 43(6), 655–661. doi:10.1177/1046496412461532

Hackman J.R., Morris C.G. Group process and group effectiveness: A reappraisal. New York: Academic Press, 1978.

Hamilton D.L. Understanding the complexities of group perception: broadening the domain. European Journal of Social Psychology, 2007, 37(6), 1077–1101. doi:10.1002/ejsp.436

Hamilton D.L., Sherman S.J., Castelli L. A group by any other name – The role of entitativity in group perception. European review of social psychology, 2002, 12(1), 139–166.

Hogg M.A., Abrams D., Otten S., Hinkle S. The Social Identity Perspective: Intergroup Relations, Self-Conception, and Small Groups. Small Group Research, 2004, 35(3), 246–276. doi:10.1177/1046496404263424

Hogg M.A., Sherman D.K., Dierselhuis J., Maitner A.T., Moffitt G. Uncertainty, entitativity, and group identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2007, 43(1), 135–142. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2005.12.008

Ip G.W.M., Chiu C.Y., Wan C. Birds of a Feather and Birds Flocking Together: Physical Versus Behavioral Cues May Lead to Trait- Versus Goal-Based Group Perception. Journal of personality and social psychology, 2006, 90(3), 368–381. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.3.368

Kornev A.V. In: Eksperimental'naya psikhologiya v Rossii: Traditsii i perspektivy. Moscow: Institut psikhologii RAN, 2010. pp. 811–816. (in Russian)

Kozlowski S.W.J., Ilgen D.R. Enhancing the Effectiveness of Work Groups and Teams. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2006, 7(3), 77–124. doi:10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00030.x

Lickel B., Hamilton D.L., Wieczorkowska G., Lewis A., Sherman S.J., Uhles A.N. Varieties of groups and the perception of group entitativity. Journal of personality and social psychology, 2000, 78(2), 223–246. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.2.223

Lickel B., Schmader T., Hamilton D.L. A Case of Collective Responsibility: Who Else Was to Blame for the Columbine High School Shootings? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2003, 29(2), 194–204. doi:10.1177/0146167202239045

Mannarini T., Rochira A., Talò C. How Identification Processes and Inter-Community Relationships Affect Sense of Community. Journal of Community Psychology, 2012, 4(8), 951–967. doi:10.1002/jcop.21504

Meneses R., Ortega R., Navarro J., de Quijano S.D. Criteria for Assessing the Level of Group Development (LGD) of Work Groups Groupness, Entitativity, and Groupality as Theoretical Perspectives. Small Group Research, 2008, 39(4), 492–514. doi:10.1177/1046496408319787

Mudrack P.E. Group Cohesiveness and Productivity: A Closer Look. Human Relations, 1989, 42(9), 771–785. doi:10.1177/001872678904200902

Mullen B., Copper C. The Relation Between Group Cohesiveness and Performance: An Integration. Psychological Bulletin, 1994, 115(2), 210–227. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.115.2.210

Petrovskii A.V. In: Psikhologicheskaya teoriya kollektiva. Moscow: Pedagogika, 1979. pp. 197–218. (in Russian)

Petrovskii A.V. Voprosy psikhologii, 1985, No. 2, 32–39. (in Russian)

Petrovskii A.V. Voprosy psikhologii, 1986, No. 1, 175–177. (in Russian)

Petrovskii V.A. Emotsional'naya identifikatsiya v gruppe i sposob ee vyyavleniya. In: K voprosu o diagnostike lichnosti v gruppe. Moscow, 1973, pp. 69–78. (in Russian)

Roca N.C. Grupos mediadores de la innovacion profesional: estudio comparativo de procesos Groups mediating in professional innovation: A comparative study of processes. Revista de Psicología Social, 2001, 16(2), 177–191. doi:doi:10.1174/021347401317351125

Rutchick A.M., Hamilton D.L., Sack J.D. Antecedents of entitativity in categorically and dynamically construed groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 2008, 38(6), 905–921. doi:10.1002/ejsp.555

Sanna L.J., Parks C.D. Group research trends in social and organizational psychology: Whatever happened to intragroup research? Psychological Science, 1997, 8(4), 261–267. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00436.x

Schachter S. An Experimental Study of Cohesiveness and Productivity. Human Relations, 1951, 4(3), 229–238. doi:10.1177/001872675100400303

Sherman S.J., Castelli L., Hamilton D.L. The spontaneous use of a group typology as an organizing principle in memory. Journal of personality and social psychology, 2002, 82(3), 328–342. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.82.3.328

Shtroo V.A. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal, 2001, 22(1), 5–15. (in Russian)

Shtroo V.A. Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki, 2007, 1(4), 151–157. (in Russian)

Wilkinson D. The Multidimensional Nature of Social Cohesion: Psychological Sense of Community, Attraction, and Neighboring. American Journal of Community Psychology, 2007, 40(3–4), 214–229. doi:10.1007/s10464-007-9140-1

Wittenbaum G.M., Moreland R.L. Small-Group Research in Social Psychology: Topics and Trends over Time. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2008, 2(1), 187–203. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00065.x

Yzerbyt V., Castano E., Leyens J.P., Paladino M.P. The primacy of the ingroup: The interplay of entitativity and identification. European review of social psychology, 2000, 11(1), 257–295.

Yzerbyt V., Rogier A., Fiske S.T. Group Entitativity and Social Attribution: On Translating Situational Constraints into Stereotypes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1998, 24(10), 1089–1103. doi:10.1177/01461672982410006

Zaccaro S.J., Lowe C.A. Cohesiveness and Performance on an Additive Task: Evidence for Multidimensionality. The Journal of social psychology, 1988, 128(4), 547–558. doi:10.1080/00224545.1988.9713774

Zhuravlev A.L. In: Psikhologija sovmestnoi zhiznedejatel'nosti malykh grupp i organizatsii. Moscow: Sotsium, 2001. pp. 120–136. (in Russian)

Zhuravlev A.L. Psikhologiya sovmestnoi deyatel'nosti. Moscow: Institut psikhologii RAN, 2005. (in Russian)

Zyphur M.J., Islam G. Toward Understanding the Existence of Groups: The Relationship between Climate Strength and Entitativity. http://econpapers.repec.org/paper/ibmibmecp/wpe_5F60.htm (дата обращения: 15.02.2013).

Число просмотров

Просмотров: 81

Опубликован

27.10.2013

Как цитировать

Климов, А. (2013). Взаимосвязь целостности группы и эффективности групповой деятельности. Психологические исследования, 6(31). https://doi.org/10.54359/ps.v6i31.670

Выпуск

Раздел

Статьи