Представления учителей о креативности детей и ее развитии в учебной деятельности
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54359/ps.v9i46.483Ключевые слова:
креативность, младшие школьники, мотивация, представления учителей, самооценки, тесты, учебная деятельностьАннотация
Представлен обзор научных публикаций, посвященных изучению представлений учителей о проявлениях творческого потенциала школьников и о возможностях развития их творческих способностей в учебной деятельности. Изложены результаты эмпирического исследования соотношения учительских, самооценочных и тестовых оценок креативности и их взаимосвязей с интеллектуальными и мотивационно-личностными показателями учащихся I и III классов (по 120 чел.). Показано несовпадение критериев оценки креативности с помощью объективных и субъективных методов. Учителя при оценке креативности детей ориентировались преимущественно на уровень их интеллекта и организованности. Самооценки творческих проявлений младших школьников демонстрировали позитивную взаимосвязь с мотивацией достижения, а в III классе – еще и с познавательной мотивацией, и с оригинальностью мышления по тесту. Полученные данные свидетельствуют о необходимости анализа диагностических показателей во всей сложности их взаимосвязей при определении креативности детей и условий ее развития в школьном обучении.
Скачивания
Библиографические ссылки
Aljughaiman A., Mowrer-Reynolds E. Teachers' conceptions of creativity and creative students. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 2005, 39(1), 17–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2005.tb01247.x
Baer J., Garrett T. Teaching for creativity in an era of content standards. In: R.A. Beghetto, J.C. Kaufman (Eds.), Nurturing Creativity in the Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. pp. 6–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511781629.003
Ball S.J. The teacher's soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 2003, 18(2), 215–228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0268093022000043065
Blake A., Edwards G., Newton D., Newton L. Some students' conceptions of creativity in primary school history. International Journal of Historical Learning, Teaching and Research, 2011, 9(2), 15–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18546/HERJ.09.2.03
Boden M.A. The Creative Mind – Myths and Mechanisms. London: Routledge, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203508527
Bolden D.S., Harries A.V., Newton D.P. Pre-service primary teachers' conceptions of creativity in mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 2010, 73(2), 143–157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-009-9207-z
Colvin G. Talent is overrated: what really separates world-class performers from everybody else. London: Nicholas Brearley Publishing, 2008.
Craft A. Possibility thinking and wise creativity: educational futures in england? In: R.A. Beghetto, J.C. Kaufman (Eds.), Nurturing Creativity in the Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. pp. 289–312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511781629.015
Cropley A.J. Creativity in education and learning. London: KoganPage, 2001.
Cropley A.J. Psikhologiya i Shkola, 2011, No. 4, 85–105. (Transl. of: Cropley A.J. Recognizing creative potential: an evaluation of usefulness of creativity tests. High ability studies, 1996, 7(2), 203–219.) (in Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0937445960070210
Dawson V.L.D., Andrea T., Affinito R., Westby E.L. Predicting creative behaviour: A re-examination of the divergence between traditional and teacher-defined concepts of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 1999, 12(1), 57–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1201_7
Druzhinin V.N. Psikhologiya obshchikh sposobnostei. St. Petersburg: Piter Kom, 2006. (in Russian)
Esquivel G.R. Teacher behaviours that foster creativity. Educational Psychology Review, 1995, 7(2), 185–202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02212493
Fairweather E., Cramond B. Infusing creative and critical thinking into the curriculum together. In: R.A. Beghetto, J.C. Kaufman (Eds.), Nurturing Creativity in the Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. pp. 13–41.
Freeman J. Gifted lives. London: Routledge, 2010.
Fryer M., Collings J.A. Teachers' views about creativity. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1991, 61(2), 207–219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1991.tb00976.x
Kashapov M.M. In: M.M. Kashapov, T.G. Kiseleva, T.V. Ogorodova (Eds.), Kreativnost' kak klyuchevaya kompetentnost' pedagoga. Yaroslavl: Indigo, 2013. pp. 43–57. (in Russian)
Kennedy M. Inside teaching: How classroom life undermines reform. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674039513
Kuhn D., Udell W. The path to wisdom. Educational Psychologist, 2001, 36(4), 261–264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3604_6
Lubart T., Mouchiroud C., Tordjman S., Zenasni F. Psikhologiya kreativnosti. Moscow: Kogito-Tsentr, 2009. (Transl. of: Lubart T., Mouchiroud C., Tordjman S., Zenasni F. Psychologie de la creativite. Paris: Armand Colin, 2003.) (in Russian)
Marley D. Ofsted slams teaching to the test. Times Educational Supplement. 25th July 2008. Available online at: http://www.tes.co.uk/article.aspx?storycode=6000653. Accessed: 18thApril 2012.
Moore K.D. Effective instructional strategies from theory to practice. London: Sage Publications, 2008.
Newton L.D. Creativity for a new curriculum: 5–11. Abingdon, Oxford: Routledge, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203117712
Newton L.D. From teaching for creative thinking to teaching for productive thought: an approach for elementary school teacher. Ulm: ICIE, 2013.
Newton L.D., Beverton S.L. Some pre-service teachers' conceptions of creativity in elementary school English. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2012, 7(3), 165–176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2012.02.002
Paton G. SATs exams promote 'teaching to the test'. The Telegraph. 6th April 2010. Available online at:http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/educationnews/7559726/Sats-exams-promote-teaching-to-the-test.html. Accessed: 18th April 2012.
Prentice R. Creativity: A reaffirmation of its place in early childhood education. The Curriculum Journal, 2000, 11(2), 145–158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09585170050045173
Renzulli J.S., Reis S.M. The schoolwide enrichment model: A how-to guide for educational excellence. 3d edition. Waco: Prufrock Press, 2014.
Rowlands S. Discussion article: Disciplinary boundaries for creativity. Creative Education, 2011, 2(1), 47–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2011.21007
Runco M.A. Creativity. Theories and themes: research, development and practice. San Diego: Elsevier Academic Press, 2007.
Runco M.A., Johnson D.J. Parents' and teachers' implicit theories of children's creativity: A cross-cultural perspective. Creativity Research Journal, 2002, 14(3–4), 427–438. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326934CRJ1434_12
Shcheblanova E.I. Psikhologicheskaya diagnostika odarennosti shkol'nikov: problemy, metody, rezul'taty issledovanii i praktiki. Voronezh: MODEK, 2004. (in Russian)
Shcheblanova E.I. Extended abstract of PhD dissertation. Psikhologicheskii institut RAO, Moscow, 2006. (in Russian)
Shumakova N.B. In: XI mezhdunarodnaya nauchno-prakticheskaya konferentsiya “Psikhologiya lichnostnogo i professional'nogo razvitiya sub'ektov nepreryvnogo obrazovaniya”. St. Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriya, 2015. pp. 268–272. (in Russian)
Sternberg R.J. Why schools should teach for wisdom: The balance of theory of wisdom in educational settings. Educational Psychologist, 2001, 36(4), 227–245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3604_2
Torrance E.P. The search for Satori and creativity. New York, NY: Creative Education Foundation, 1979.
Voronin A.N. Extended abstract of PhD dissertation. Institut psikhologii RAN, Moscow, 2004. (in Russian)
Waters-Adams S. The relationship between understanding the nature of science and practice: The influence of teachers' beliefs about education, teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 2006, 25(8), 919–944. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500498351
