Возможные Я в романтических отношениях: их объяснительные качества и возможности интервенции
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54359/ps.v16i91.1451Ключевые слова:
возможное я, я-концепция, романтические отношения, экзистенциальная исполненность, удовлетворенность отношениямиАннотация
«Возможное» в романтических отношениях представляет большой интерес с объяснительной и прикладной (психотерапевтической) точки зрения. Для операционализации этой сферы жизни в рамках настоящего исследования был привлечен конструкт «Возможного Я». Феномен агентности, лежащий в основе Возможного Я, способен выступить в качестве ресурса развития романтических отношений (повышения их качества), а также иметь прикладное значение. На первом этапе исследования участвовали 36 пар, на втором этапе – люди, состоящие в отношениях, всего 136 человек. Были использованы модифицированная методика диагностики Возможных Я К. Хукер, тест экзистенциальных мотиваций в межличностных отношениях, тест созависимости в отношениях и шкала самооценки М. Розенберга. Дизайн исследования предполагал вычисление рассогласованности в том, как партнеры оценивают возможности друг друга, представляя, будто это их собственные возможности. Перенимая на себя то, что другой партнер видит в качестве желаемого развития будущего для пары, человек сравнивает это видение с собственным, в итоге оценивая, насколько данные возможности оказываются ему близки. Результаты исследования демонстрируют, что уровень согласованности оценок Возможных Я связан с уровнем удовлетворенности отношениями.
Скачивания
Литература
Varga A.Ia. Vvedenie v sistemnuiu semeinuiu psikhoterapiiu. M.: Kogito-Tsentr, 2011. 240. (In Russian)
Zolotareva A.A. Validity and reliability of the Russian version of the Rosenberg self-esteem scale. // Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriia: Psikhologiia. 2020, No. 2, 52–57. DOI:10.24147/2410-6364.2020.2.52-57. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
Kostenko V.Yu. Possible Self: Theory by Hazel Markus. Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 2016, Vol. 13, No. 2, 421–430.
Kostenko V.Yu., Grishutina M.M. Impossible Self: preliminary research in the context of the theory of Hazel Marcus [Elektronnyi resurs]. Penzenskii psikhologicheskii vestnik. 2018, No. 1, 126–148. DOI: 10.17689/psy-2018.1.8. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.)
Kronik A.A., Kronik E.A. Psikhologiia chelovecheskikh otnoshenii. // Dubna: Kogito-Tsentr. 1998. 224 (In Russian)
Längle А. Fundamental'nye motivatsii ekzistentsii kak deistvennaia struktura ekzistentsial'no-analiticheskoi terapii [Elektronnyi resurs]. Ekzistentsial'nyi analiz, 2009, No. 1, 9–30. Available at: http://aeapp.ru/sites/default/files/uploads/bulletin_11.pdf (Accessed 25.05.2020) (In Russian)
Moskalenko V.D. Zavisimost'. Semeinaia bolezn'. // Moskva: Institut konsul'tirovaniia i sis-temnykh reshenii. 2014. 360. (In Russian)
Skvortsova S.N., Shumskii V.B. Strukturnaia model' fenomena zavisimosti v blizkikh mezhlich-nostnykh otnosheniiakh [Elektronnyi resurs]. Konsul'tativnaia psikhologiia i psikhoterapiia = Сounseling Psychology and Psychotherapy, 2013, No. 44, 51–69. Available at: https://psyjournals.ru/mpj/2013/n4/65279.shtml (Accessed 25.05.2020). (In Russian)
Skinner R., Kliiz Dzh. Sem'ia i kak v nei utselet'. // Perev. s angl. N.M. Padalko. Moskva: АСТ. 2004. 272. (In Russian)
Ukolova E.M., Shumskii V.B. Test ekzistentsial'nykh motivatsii v mezhlichnostnykh otnosheniiakh: razrabotka i aprobatsiia. Ekzistentsial'nyi analiz, 2012, No. 4, 187–202. (In Rus-sian)
Ukolova E.M., Shumskii V.B., Osin E.N. TEMMO – oprosnik dlia otsenki ekzistentsial'noi ispolnennosti v otnosheniiakh: faktornaia struktura, nadezhnost' i validnost' [Elektronnyi resurs]. Ekzistentsial'nyi analiz, 2016, No. 8, 151–217. Available at: https://publications.hse.ru/pubs/share/folder/ulgixze7dp/192257069.pdf (Accessed 25.05.2020). (In Russian)
Assad K.K., Donnellan M.B., Conger R.D. Optimism: An enduring resource for romantic rela-tionships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2007, No. 93(2), 285–297. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.2.285
Berscheid E. The greening of relationship science. American Psychologist, 1999, No. 54, 260–266. DOI: 10.1037//0003-066x.54.4.260
Buss D.M. The great struggles of life: Darwin and the emergence of evolutionary psychology. American Psychologist, 2009, No. 64, 140–148.
Campbell L., Stanton S.C. Adult attachment and trust in romantic relationships. Current opinion in psychology, 2019, No. 25, 148–151. DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.08.004
Cramer D. Consensus Change, Conflict, and Relationship Satisfaction in Romantic Relationships. The Journal of Psychology, 2002, No. 135(3), 313–320. DOI: 10.1080/00223980109603701
Cross S., Markus H. Self-schemas, possible selves, and competent performance. Journal of Edu-cational Psychology, 1994, No. 86(3), 423–438.
Dyrenforth P.S., Kashy D.A., Donnellan M.B., Lucas R.E. Predicting relationship and life satis-faction from personality in nationally representative samples from three countries: The relative importance of actor, partner, and similarity effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psycholo-gy, 2010, No. 99, 690–702. DOI:10.1037/a0020385.
Erikson M.G. The Meaning of the Future: Toward a More Specific Definition of Possible Selves. Review of General Psychology, 2007, No. 11(4), 348–358. DOI:10.1037/1089-2680.11.4.348
Fincham F.D., Beach S.R.H. Relationship satisfaction. In D. Perlman & A. Vangelisti (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2006, 579–594.
Finkel E.J., Eastwick P.W., Karney B.R., Reis H.T., and Sprecher S. Online dating: A critical analysis from the perspective of psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public In-terest, 2012, No. 13, 1–64. DOI:10.1177/1529100612436522
Finkenauer C., Buyukcan-Tetik A. To know you is to feel intimate with you: Felt knowledge is rooted in disclosure, solicitation, and intimacy. Family Science, 2015, No. 6(1), 109–118. DOI:10.1080/19424620.2015.1082012
Fischer J.L., Spann L., Crawford D. Measuring codependency. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 1991, No. 8, 87–100.
Fletcher G.J.O., Simpson J.A., Thomas G., and Giles L. Ideals in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1999, No. 76(1), 72–89. DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.76.1.72
Floyd K. Communicating affection: Interpersonal behavior and social context. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
Furler K., Gomez V., Grob A. Personality perceptions and relationship satisfaction in couples [Electronic Resources]. Journal of Research in Personality, 2014, No. 50, 33–41. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0092656614000178?via%3Dihub. (Ac-cessed: 23.05.2020).
Gerlach T.M., Driebe J.C., Reinhard S.K. Personality and Romantic Relationship Satisfaction. Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. 2018, 1–8. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_718-1
Grishutina M., Kostenko V. Variety of Possible Selves: The Role of Agency and Empirical Evi-dence Review. Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 2022, Vol. 19, No. 2, 405–423. DOI: 10.17323/1813-8918-2022-2-405-423
Guerrero L.K., Anderson P.A., Afifi W.A. Close Encounters: Communication in Relationships (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage, 2011.
Hendrick S.S. A Generic Measure of Relationship Satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and Family, 1988, Vol. 50, No. 1, 93–98. DOI:10.2307/352430
Hooker K. Possible Selves and Perceived Health in Older Adults and College Students. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 1992, No. 47(2), 85–95. DOI: 10.1093/geronj/47.2.p85
Hudson N.W., Fraley R.C. Partner similarity matters for the insecure: Attachment orientations moderate the association between similarity in partners’ personality traits and relationship satis-faction. Journal of Research in Personality, 2014, No. 53, 112–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.09.004.
Kenny D.A., Kashy D.A., Cook W.L. Dyadic data analysis. New York: Guilford Press, 2006.
Laurenceau J-P, Barrett L.F., Rovine M.J. The interpersonal process model of intimacy in mar-riage: a daily-diary and multilevel modeling approach. Journal of Family Psychology, 2005, No. 19, 314–323. DOI: 10.1037/0893-3200.19.2.314
Lemay E.P., Lin J.L., Muir H.J. Daily affective and behavioral forecasts in romantic relationships: Seeing tomorrow through the lens of today. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2015, No. 41(7), 1005–1019. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215588756
Lemay E.P., Venaglia R.B. Relationship Expectations and Relationship Quality. Review of Gen-eral Psychology, 2016, No. 20(1), 57–70. DOI: 10.1037/gpr0000066
Markus H., Nurius P. Possible Selves. American Psychologist, 1986, No. 41(9), 954–969. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.41.9.954
Murray S.L., Holmes J.G., Bellavia G., Griffin D.W., and Dolderman D. Kindred spirits? The benefits of egocentrism in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2002, No. 82, 563–581. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.82.4.563
Oettingen, G., & Mayer, D. The motivating function of thinking about the future: Expectations versus fantasies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2002, No. 83(5), 1198–1212. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.83.5.1198
Rempel J.K., Ross M., Holmes J.G. Trust and Communicated Attributions in Close Relation-ships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2001, No. 81(1), 57–54. DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.81.1.57
Rosenberg М. Self-Esteem Scale. Measures of Social Psychological Attitudes. 1972, 98–101.
Ruvolo A.P., Markus H.R. Possible Selves and performance: the power of self-relevant imagery. Social Cognition, 1992, No. 10(1), 95–124. DOI: 10.1521/soco.1992.10.1.95
Sacher J.A., Fine M.A. Predicting relationship status and satisfaction after six months among da-ting couples. Journal of Marriage & the Family, 1996, No. 58(1), 21–32. DOI:10.2307/353374
Schindler I., Berg C., Butler J., Fortenberry K., and Wiebe D. Late-Midlife and Older Couples' Shared Possible Selves and Psychological Well-being During Times of Illness: The Role of Col-laborative Problem Solving. The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences, 2010, No. 65, 416–24. DOI:10.1093/geronb/gbq030
Slotter E.B., Gardner W.L. Where Do You End and I Begin? Evidence for Anticipatory, Motivat-ed Self–Other Integration Between Relationship Partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psy-chology, 2009, No. 96(6), 1137–1151. DOI: 10.1037/a0013882
Slotter E.B., Gardner W.L., Finkel E.J. Who Am I Without You? The Influence of Romantic Breakup on the Self-Concept. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2010, No. 36(2), 147–160. DOI: 10.1177/0146167209352250
Smetana J.G, Campione-Barr N., Metzger A. Adolescent development in interpersonal and socie-tal contexts. Annu Rev Psychol. 2006, No. 57, 255–284. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190124
Sprecher S., Treger S., Wondra J.D., Hilaire N., and Wallpe K. Taking turns: reciprocal self-disclosure promotes liking in initial interactions. J Exp Soc Psychol, 2013, No. 49, 860–866. DOI:10.1016/J.JESP.2013.03.017
Srivastava S., McGonigal K.M., Richards J.M., Butler E.A., and Gross J.J. Optimism in close re-lationships: How seeing things in a positive light makes them so. Journal of Personality and So-cial Psychology, 2006, No. 91, 143–153. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.91.1.143
Sternberg R.J., Barnes M.L. Real and ideal others in romantic relationships: Is four a crowd? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1985, No. 49(6), 1586–1608. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.49.6.1586
Wieselquist J. Interpersonal forgiveness, trust and the investment model of commitment. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2009, No. 26(4), 531–548. DOI: 10.1177/0265407509347931
Wilson S.J., Jon Barrineau M., Butner J., and Berg C.A. Shared Possible Selves, Other-Focus, and Perceived Wellness of Couples With Prostate Cancer. Journal of Family Psychology, 2014, No. 28(5), 684–691. DOI: 10.1037/fam0000015
Загрузки
Число просмотров
Опубликован
Как цитировать
Выпуск
Раздел
Лицензия
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution-NonCommercial» («Атрибуция — Некоммерческое использование») 4.0 Всемирная.
