Шкала имплицитных теорий креативности М. Карвовски: апробация русскоязычной модификации

Аполлинария Голинец

doi:10.54359/ps.v19i106.2078

Авторы

Аполлинария Голинец Московский государственный университет имени М.В. Ломоносова, Москва, Российская Федерация

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54359/ps.v19i106.2078

Аннотация

В статье представлены результаты апробации русскоязычной версии опросника «Шкала имплицитных теорий креативности» (Creative Mindset Scale — CMS), разработанного М. Карвовски для измерения инкрементальных и константных имплицитных теорий креативности. Целью работы являлась проверка психометрических характеристик (факторной структуры и надежности шкал) и валидности русскоязычной модификации опросника CMS посредством установления связей с другими самоотчетными методиками, измеряющими имплицитные теории креативности (КИТ), личности и интеллекта (Двек), а также с общей (СОК) и домен-специфичной самооценками креативности (K-DOCS). В исследовании приняли участие студенты высших учебных заведений (N = 202 для оценки факторной структуры, N = 247 для связей с опросниками КИТ, СОК, K-DOCS, N = 244 для связей с опросником ИТ по Двек). Результаты свидетельствуют в пользу сохранения двухфакторной структуры опросника CMS на российской выборке, соответствующей структуре оригинального опросника, и демонстрируют его конвергентную валидность. Полученные данные свидетельствуют о возможности использования русскоязычной версии CMS для диагностики имплицитных представлений о креативности в отечественных исследованиях.

Скачивания

Данные по скачиваниям пока не доступны.

Биография автора

Аполлинария Голинец, Московский государственный университет имени М.В. Ломоносова, Москва, Российская Федерация

Аспирант кафедры общей психологии факультета психологии МГУ им. М.В. Ломоносова, ул. Моховая, д. 11, стр. 9, 125009, Москва, Россия

Библиографические ссылки

Andiliou A., Murphy P.K. Examining variations among researchers' and teachers' conceptualizations of creativity: A review and synthesis of contemporary research. Educational Research Review, 2010, No. 5(3), 201–219.

Burnette J.L., O'boyle E.H., VanEpps E.M., Pollack J.M., Finkel E.J. Mind-sets matter: a meta-analytic review of implicit theories and self-regulation. Psychological Bulletin, 2013, No. 139(3), 655–701.

Camarda A., Lubart T. Measuring creative potential and its development. // In: The Oxford Handbook of Creativity and Education. — Oxford: Oxford Handbooks, 2025. — pp. 684–708. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197698181.013.0037

Dweck C.S. Novaya psikhologiya uspekha. Dumai i pobezhdai. / T. Luchko, Trans. — Kharkiv: Knizhnyi klub "Klub Semeinogo Dosuga", 2007. [in Russian]

Dweck C.S. Implicit Theories. // In: Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology. — London: SAGE Publications Ltd., 2012. — Vol. 2. — pp. 43–61.

Glăveanu V.P. Rewriting the language of creativity: The five A's framework. Review of General Psy-chology, 2013, No. 17, 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029528

Golinets A.O. Vzaimosvyaz' samootsenki kreativnosti i implitsitnykh teorii kreativnosti. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 14. Psikhologiya, 2025, No. 48(4), 109–126. https://doi.org/10.11621/LPJ-25-43 [in Russian]

Hopp M., Händel M., Stoeger H., Vialle W., Ziegler A. A cross-national study of implicit theories of a creative person. Education Sciences, 2016, No. 6(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci6040038

Ishiguro C., Matsumoto K., Agata T., Noguchi H., Okada T. Development of a Japanese Version of the Creative Mindset Scale (CMS) Using Item Response Theory. Japanese Psychological Research, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpr.125442024

Karakelle Ş., Sarac S. Creative mindsets scale: Turkish validity and reliability. Cyprus Turkish Journal of Psychiatry and Psychology, 2022, No. 4(2), 122–129.

Karwowski M. I'm creative, but am I Creative? Similarities and differences between self-evaluated small and Big C creativity in Poland. The International Journal of Creativity and Problem Solving, 2009, No. 19, 7–26.

Karwowski M. Creative mindsets: Measurement, correlates, consequences. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2014, No. 8(1), 62–70.

Kaufman J.C., Baer J. Sure, I'm creative — but not in mathematics!: Self-reported creativity in diverse domains. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 2004, No. 22(2), 143–155.

Kaufman J.C., Beghetto R.A. Beyond big and little: The four c model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 2009, No. 13, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013688

Kaufman J.C. Counting the muses: Development of the Kaufman Domains Of Creativity Scale (K–DOCS). Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2012, No. 6(4), 298–308. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029751

Kornilova T.V. Intellektual'no-lichnostnyi potentsial cheloveka v usloviyakh neopredelennosti i riska. — St. Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriya, 2016. [in Russian]

Kornilova T.V., Chumakova M.A., Kornilov S.A., Novikova M.A. Psikhologiya neopredelennosti: Edinstvo intellektual'no-lichnostnogo potentsiala cheloveka. — Moscow: Smysl, 2010. [in Russian]

Kornilova T.V., Chumakova M.A., Maksarova L.B. Intelligence Types Predict Different Domains of Emotional Creativity Through Self-Assessed Creativity and Intelligence. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 2025, No. 18(1), 60–82. https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2025.0104

Kornilova T.V., Shestova M.A., Pavlova E.M. Emotsional'naya kreativnost' v sisteme svyazei s emotsional'no-lichnostnoi sferoi i implitsitnymi teoriyami kreativnosti. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal, 2020, No. 41(4), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.31857/S020595920010388-2 [in Russian]

Kornilova T.V., Smirnov S.D., Chumakova M.V., Kornilov S.A., Novototskaya-Vlasova E.V. Modi-fikatsiya oprosnikov C. Dweck v kontekste izucheniya akademicheskikh dostizhenii studentov. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal, 2008, No. 29(3), 86–100. [in Russian]

Kyler E.N., Moscicki M.K. Measuring many mindsets: A systematic review of growth mindset do-mains, and discussion of domain relationships, with implications for growth mindset interventions. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2024, No. 18(11). https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.70015

Lebuda I., Hofer G., Benedek M. Determinants of creative metacognitive monitoring: creativity, per-sonality, and task-related predictors of self-assessed ideas and creative performance. Metacognition and Learning, 2025, No. 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-025-09432-2

Loewenstein J., Mueller J. Implicit theories of creative ideas: How culture guides creativity assess-ments. Academy of Management Discoveries, 2016, No. 2(4), 320–348.

Maksić S.B., Spasenović V.Z. Educational science students' implicit theories of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 2018, No. 30(3), 287–294.

Miroshnik K.G., Shcherbakova O.V., Kaufman J.C. Kaufman domains of creativity scale: Relation-ship to occupation and measurement invariance across gender. Creativity Research Journal, 2022, No. 34(2), 159–177.

Parsasirat Z., Foroughi A., Yusooff F., Subhi N., Nen S., Farhadi H. Effect of socioeconomic status on emersion adolescent creativity. Asian Social Science, 2013, No. 9(4), 105–112.

Pavlova E.M. Osobennosti funktsionirovaniya kreativnogo potentsiala u professional'nykh pisatelei. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya: Psikhologicheskie nauki, 2014a, No. 3, 10–16. [in Russian]

Pavlova E.M. Implitsitnye teorii i samootsenka kreativnosti v strukture samosoznaniya lichnosti. Psikhologiya. Zhurnal vysshei shkoly ekonomiki, 2014b, No. 11(4), 75–94. [in Russian]

Pavlova E.M. Model' svyazei samootsenki kreativnosti i intellekta s tolerantnost'yu k neopredelennosti i kreativnost'yu. Psikhologiya. Zhurnal vysshei shkoly ekonomiki, 2018, No. 15(1), 69–78. [in Rus-sian]

Pavlova E.M., Kornilova T.V. Implicit Theories and Self-Esteem of Creativity in the Structure of Self-Consciousness. // In: E.M. Pavlova, T.V. Kornilova (eds.), Understanding Creativity: Past, Present and Future Perspectives. — New York: Nova Science Publishers, 2019. — pp. 61–77.

Rhemtulla M., Brosseau-Liard P.É., Savalei V. When can categorical variables be treated as continu-ous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychological Methods, 2012, No. 17(3), 354–373.

Rhodes M. An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappan, 1961, No. 42(7), 305–310.

Runco M.A. Motivation, competence, and creativity. Handbook of competence and motivation, 2005, 609–623.

Sternberg R.J. Implicit theories of intelligence, creativity, and wisdom. Journal of Personality and So-cial Psychology, 1985, No. 49(3), 607–627.

Tang M., Werner C., Karwowski M. Differences in creative mindset between Germany and Poland: The mediating effect of individualism and collectivism. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2016, No. 21, 31–40.

Warren F., Mason-Apps E., Hoskins S., Azmi Z., Boyce J. The role of implicit theories, age, and gender in the creative performance of children and adults. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2018, No. 28, 98–109.

Zhou Y., Yang W., Bai X. Creative mindsets: Scale validation in the Chinese setting and generaliza-tion to the real workplace. Frontiers in Psychology, 2020, No. 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00463

Zinchenko V.P. Soznanie kak predmet i delo psikhologii. Metodologiya i istoriya psikhologii, 2006, No. 1(1), 207–231. [in Russian]

Zirenko M.S. Implicit theories of intelligence and personality: relations to intelligence, motivation and personality. Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshei Shkoly Ekonomiki, 2018, No. 15(1), 39–53.