Проблема трансформации перцептивных процессов в ходе обучения: анализ исследований, выполненных методом записи движений глаз, с позиций деятельностного подхода
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54359/ps.v9i49.422Ключевые слова:
теория деятельности, восприятие, движения глаз, эксперты, новички, обучение с помощью мультимедиа-средств, гипотеза редукции информацииАннотация
Представлен аналитический обзор современных исследований движений глаз, связанных с восприятием визуальных материалов в процессе обучения. Выделяются основные проблемы: специфика процессов восприятия экспертов по сравнению c новичками или находящимися на стадии обучения; перестройка восприятия под влиянием обучающего воздействия; характеристики визуальных материалов, способствующих пониманию; особенности визуального выделения частей изображения и его воздействие на процессы восприятия и осмысления учебных материалов. Акцент делается на интерпретации результатов исследований с позиций деятельностного подхода, позволяющего снять ряд противоречий и объяснить неожиданные результаты.
Скачивания
Библиографические ссылки
Andrà C., Arzarello F., Ferrara F., Holmqvist K., Lindstrom P., Robutti O., Sabena C. How students read mathematical representations: an eye tracking study. Proceedings of 33rd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics, 2009, 123–131.
Bednarik R., Shipilov A. Gaze cursor during distant collaborative programming: A preliminary analysis. Dual Eye Tracking in CSCW, 2011.
Berthold, K., Renkl, A. Instructional aids to support a conceptual understanding of multiple representations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2009, 101(1), 70–87. doi:10.1037/a0013247 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013247
Boucheix J. M., Lowe R. An eye tracking comparison of external pointing cues and internal continuous cues in learning with complex animations. Learning and Instruction, 2010, Vol. 20, 123–135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.015
Canham, M., Hegarty, M., Effects of knowledge and display design on comprehension of complex graphics. Learning and Instruction, 2009, 20(2), 155–166. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.014
De Koning B. B., Tabbers H. K., Rikers R. M. J. P., Paas F. Attention guidance in learning from complex animation: Seeing is understanding? Learning and Instruction, 2010, 20(2), 111–122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.010
Demareva V.A., Polevaya S.A. Searching for psychophysiological markers of foreign language proficiency: Evidence from eye tracking. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 2012, 85(3), 392. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.07.081
Epelboim J., Suppes P. A model of eye movements and visual working memory during problem solving in geometry. Vision Research, 2001, Vol. 41, 1561–1574. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989(00)00256-X
Eitel A., Scheiter K., Schüler A., Nyström M., Holmqvist K. How a picture facilitates the process of learning from text: Evidence for scaffolding. Learning and Instruction, 2013, Vol. 28, 48–63. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.05.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.05.002
Ericsson K. A., Kintsch W. Long-term working memory. Psychological Review, 1995, Vol. 102, 211–245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.102.2.211
Fabrikant S. I., Hespanha S. R., Hegarty M. Cognitively inspired and perceptually salient graphic displays for efficient spatial inference making. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2010, 100(1), 13–29. doi:10.1080/00045600903362378 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00045600903362378
Gal'perin P.Ya. Lektsii po psikhologii: Uchebnoe posobie dlya studentov vuzov. Moscow: Universitet, 2002 (in Russian)
Gegenfurtner A., Lehtinen E., Säljö R. Expertise differences in the comprehension of visualizations: a meta-analysis of eye-tracking research in professional domains. Educational Psychology Reviewer, 2011, 23(4), 523–552. doi:10.1007/s10648-011-9174-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-011-9174-7
Gippenreyter Yu.B. Dvizheniya chelovecheskogo glaza. Moscow: Mos. gos. universitet, 1978. (in Russian)
Grant E. R., Spivey M. J. Eye Movements and Problem Solving: Guiding Attention Guides Thought. Psychological Science, 2003, 14(5), 462–466. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.02454 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.02454
Haider H., Frensch P. A. The role of information reduction in skill acquisition. Cognitive Psychology, 1996, Vol. 30, 304–337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1996.0009
Haider H., Frensch P. A. Eye movement during skill acquisition: More evidence for the information-reduction hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 1999, Vol. 25, 172–190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.25.1.172
Holsanova, J., Holmberg, N., Holmqvist, K. Reading information graphics: The role of spatial contiguity and dual attentional guidance. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2009, 23(9), 1215–1226. doi:10.1002/acp.1525 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1525
Inglis M., Alcock L., Expert and novice approaches to reading mathematical proofs. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 2012, 43(4), 358–390. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.43.4.0358
Jarodzka H., Scheiter K., Gerjets P., van Gog T. In the eyes of the beholder: How experts and novices interpret dynamic stimuli. Learning and Instruction, 2010, 20(2), 146–154. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.019
Jarodzka, H., van Gog, T., Dorr, M., Scheiter, K., Gerjets, P. (2013). Learning to see: guiding students’ attention via a model’s eye movements fosters learning. Learning and Instruction, Vol. 25, 62–70. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.11.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.11.004
Kim S. W., Rehder B. How prior knowledge affects selective attention during category learning: An eye tracking study. Memory and Cognition, 2011, Vol. 39, 649–665. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-010-0050-3
Krichevets A.N., Shvarts A.Yu., Chumachenko D.V. Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki, 2014, 11(3), 55–78. http://psy-journal.hse.ru/data/2015/02/24/1090737757/Krichevets,%20Shvarts,%20Chumachenko_3_2014_55_78.pdf
Kundel H.L., Nodine C.F., Conant E.F., Weinstein S.P. Holistic component of image perception in mammogram interpretation: Gaze-tracking study. Radiology, 2007, Vol. 242, 396–402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2422051997
Kuravskiy L.S., Marmalyuk P.A., Barabanshchikov V.A., Bezrukikh M.M., Demidov A.A., Ivanov V.V., Yur'ev G.A. Voprosy psikhologii, 2013, No. 5, 1–17. (in Russian)
Leontiev A.N. Deyatel'nost'. Soznanie. Lichnost'. Moscow: Politizdat, 1975.
Mayer R.E., Moreno R. A split-attention effect in multimedia learning: evidence for dual processing systems in working memory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1998, Vol. 90, 312–320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.90.2.312
Meng-Lung Lai, Meng-Jung Tsai, Fang-Ying Yang, Chung-Yuan Hsu, Tzu-Chien Liu, Silvia Wen-Yu Lee, Min-Hsien Lee, Guo-Li Chiou, Jyh-Chong Liang, Chin-Chung Tsai, A review of using eye-tracking technology in exploring learning from 2000 to 2012. Educational Research Review, 2013, Vol. 10, 90–115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.10.001
Meyer K., Rasch T., Schnotz W. Effects of animation’s speed of presentation on perceptual processing and learning. Learning and Instruction, 2010, 20(2), 136–145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.016
Nystrom M., Orgen M. How illustrations influence performance and eye-movement behaviour when solving problems in vector calculus. Proceedings, In LTHs 7:e Pedagogiska Inspirationskonferens, 2012.
Ooms K., De Maeyer P., Fack V., Van Assche A., Witlox F. Interpreting maps through the eyes of expert and novice users. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 2012, 26(10), 1733–1788. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2011.642801
Peters M., Parsing mathematical constructs: Results from a preliminary eye tracking study. Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, 2010, 30(2), 47–52.
Podol'skiy A. I. Stanovlenie poznavatel'nogo deystviya: nauchnaya abstraktsiya i real'nost'. Moscow: Mos. gos. universitet, 1987. (in Russian)
Rasch, T., Schnotz, W. Interactive and non-interactive pictures in multimedia learning environments: Effects on learning outcomes and learning efficiency. Learning and Instruction, 2009, 19(5), 411–422. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.008
Reingold E.M., Sheridan H. The perceptual component of chess expertise: Evidence from eye movements. In: U. Ansorge, T. Ditye, A. Florack, H. Leder, (Eds.), Abstracts of the 18th European Conference on Eye Movements, Vienna. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 8(4):1. P. 37.
Rouinfar A., Agra E., Larson A.M., Rebello N.S., Loschky L.C. Linking attentional processes and conceptual problem solving: visual cues facilitate the automaticity of extracting relevant information from diagrams. Frontal Psychology, 2014, Vol. 5. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01094 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01094
Salmina N.G. Znak i simvol v obuchenii. Moscow: Mos. gos. universitet, 1988. (in Russian)
Saß S., Wittwer J., Senkbeil M., Köller O. Pictures in Test Items: Effects on Response Time and Response Correctness. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2012, Vol. 26, 70–81. doi: 10.1002/acp.1798 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1798
Scheiter K., Schüler A., Gerjets P., Huk T., Hesse F.W. Extending multimedia research: How do prerequisite knowledge and reading comprehension affect learning from text and pictures. Computers in Human Behavior, 2014, Vol. 31, 73–84. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.09.022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.09.022
Scheiter K., Eitel A. The Effects of Signals on Learning from Text and Diagrams: How Looking at Diagrams Earlier and More Frequently Improves Understanding. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2010, 264–270. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-14600-8_26 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14600-8_26
Schmidt-Weigand F., Kohnert A., Glowalla U. Explaining the modality and contiguity effects: new insights from investigating students’ viewing behavior. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2010,Vol. 24, 226–237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1554
Shvarts A.Yu. PhD dissertation (Psychology). Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 2011. (in Russian)
Shvarts A. In: E.V. Pechenkova, M.V. Falikman (Eds.), Kognitivnaya nauka v Moskve: novye issledovaniya. Materialy konferentsii. 19 June 2013. Moscow: Buki Vedi, 2013. (in Russian)
Shvarts A., Krichevets A. The perception of the number line by adults and preschoolers: eye-movements during the teaching process. In: U. Ansorge, T. Ditye, A. Florack, H. Leder (Eds.), Abstracts of the 18th European Conference on Eye Movements, 2015, Vienna. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 2015, 8(4). P. 37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.8.4.1
Tikhomirov O.K. Psikhologiya myshleniya. Uchebnoe posobie. Moscow: Mos. gos. universitet, 1984. (in Russian)
Van Gog T., Jarodzka H., Scheiter K., Gerjets P., Paas F. Attention guidance during example study via the model’s eye movements. Computers in Human Behavior, 2009, Vol. 25, 785–791. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.02.007
Vonder Embse C.B. An eye fixation study of time factors comparing experts and novices when reading and interpreting mathematical graphs. PhD dissertation. The Ohio State University, 1987. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED283672
Vygotskiy L.S. Razvitievysshikhpsikhicheskikhfunktsiy. Moscow: APN RSFSR, 1960. (in Russian)
Wood G., Knapp K. M., Rock B., Cousens C., Roobottom C., Wilson M. R. Visual expertise in detecting and diagnosing skeletal fractures. Skeletal Radiology, 2012, 42(2), 165–172. doi:10.1007/s00256-012-1503-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-012-1503-5
Yarbus A. L. Rol' dvizheniy glaz v protsesse zreniya.Moscow: Nauka, 1965. (in Russian)
Zaporozhets A.V., Venger L.A., Zinchenko V.P., Ruzskaya A.G. Vospriyatie i deystvie. Moscow: Nauka, 1967. (in Russian)
