Personality authenticity in a cultural coordinate system: A preliminary study in Russia and Uzbekistan

Authors

  • Adela Gerts Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики» (НИУ ВШЭ), департамент психологии

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54359/ps.v19i108.2213

Abstract

Introduction / Problem. Authenticity is regarded as one of the key factors of psychological well-being; however, its relationship with cultural context, particularly in comparative research, remains insufficiently explored. Despite growing interest in the cross-cultural aspects of authenticity, the mechanisms through which it manifests itself in different cultural environments have been studied only fragmentarily. Objective. The aim of the study was to identify cross-cultural differences in the level and components of authenticity among participants from Russia and Uzbekistan, as well as to examine its associations with perceived cultural types within G. Triandis’s model of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism. Methods. The study involved 149 respondents aged 18–35 years (M = 23.4; SD = 4.1), including 74 participants from Russia and 75 from Uzbekistan. The following instruments were used: the Moscow Authenticity Scale, the short version of the Kernis–Goldman Authenticity Inventory, and the Perceived Community Culture Assessment Method. Data were analyzed within a comparative cross-cultural design. Results. The Russian sample demonstrated higher levels of overall authenticity and its components, including awareness, behavior, and relational orientation. Horizontal individualism showed consistent positive associations with all aspects of authenticity. Horizontal collectivism was also positively associated with overall authenticity, awareness, and relational orientation. Vertical collectivism demonstrated negative associations, whereas vertical individualism showed no statistically significant associations. Conclusions. The findings suggest that authenticity is not an exclusively individualistic phenomenon and may also manifest under conditions of egalitarian collectivism. Cultural context has a differentiated influence on the components of authenticity, affecting interpersonal aspects to a greater extent. The study clarifies the conditions of authentic self-expression in different sociocultural environments and provides a basis for further cross-cultural research on authenticity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Adela Gerts, Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики» (НИУ ВШЭ), департамент психологии

    Graduate of the PhD Program, Department of Psychology, National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE).

References

Галлямова, А. А., & Григорьев, Д. С. (2022). Разработка методики оценки воспринимаемой культуры сообщества на основе культурной ориентации «горизонтальный/вертикальный ин-дивидуализм–коллективизм» Г. Триандиса. Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Психология и педагогика, 19(3), 429–447. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1683-2022-19-3-429-447

Gallyamova, A. A., & Grigoriev, D. S. (2022). Development of a method for assessing perceived community culture based on H. Triandis’s horizontal/vertical individualism–collectivism cultural orientation. RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics, 19(3), 429–447. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1683-2022-19-3-429-447 (In Russian)

Герц, А. Б. (2025). Образ родителей у людей с разным уровнем диспозициональной аутентич-ности: предварительное исследование. Психологические исследования, 18(99), 1–15. http://psystudy.ru

Gerts, A. B. (2025). Parental images among individuals with different levels of dispositional authen-ticity: A preliminary study. Psychological Studies, 18(99), 1–15. (In Russian) http://psystudy.ru

Лебедева, Н. М. (2021). Сравнительное исследование социального капитала и экономических установок в культурах Запада и Востока. Психологический журнал, 42(3), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.31857/S020595920014917-8

Lebedeva, N. M. (2021). Comparative study of social capital and economic attitudes in Western and Eastern cultures. Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal, 42(3), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.31857/S020595920014917-8 (In Russian)

Нартова-Бочавер, С. К., Ирхин, Б. Д., & Резниченко, С. И. (2020). Диспозициональная аутен-тичность во внутриличностном пространстве. Психология. Журнал Высшей школы экономи-ки, 17(3), 500–519. https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8918-2020-3-500-519

Nartova-Bochaver, S. K., Irkhin, B. D., & Reznichenko, S. I. (2020). Dispositional authenticity in intrapersonal space. Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 17(3), 500–519. https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8918-2020-3-500-519 (In Russian)

Нартова-Бочавер, С. К., Корнеев, А. А., & Резниченко, С. И. (2022). Краткая версия Опросни-ка аутентичности Керниса–Голдмана: адаптация в России. Консультативная психология и психотерапия, 30(3), 150–171. https://doi.org/10.17759/cpp.2022300309

Nartova-Bochaver, S. K., Korneev, A. A., & Reznichenko, S. I. (2022). Short version of the Kernis–Goldman Authenticity Inventory: Adaptation in Russia. Counseling Psychology and Psychothera-py, 30(3), 150–171. https://doi.org/10.17759/cpp.2022300309 (In Russian)

Нартова-Бочавер, С. К., & Пак, В. В. (2022). Аутентичность и способность прощать при разных уровнях стресса: предварительное исследование. Клиническая и специальная психология, 11(1), 141–163. https://psyjournals.ru/psyclin/, https://doi.org/10.17759/cpse.2022110108

Nartova-Bochaver, S. K., & Pak, V. V. (2022). Authenticity and forgiveness under different stress levels: A preliminary study. Clinical Psychology and Special Education, 11(1), 141–163. (In Rus-sian) https://psyjournals.ru/psyclin/, https://doi.org/10.17759/cpse.2022110108

Роджерс, К. (1994). Взгляд на психотерапию. Становление человека. Прогресс.

Rodgers, C. (1994). A look at psychotherapy. Becoming a person. Progress. (In Russian)

Сартр, Ж.-П. (2000). Бытие и ничто: Опыт феноменологической онтологии (В. И. Колядко, пер.). АСТ.

Sartre, J.-P. (2000). Being and nothingness: An essay on phenomenological ontology (V. I. Kolyadko, Trans.). AST. (In Russian)

Татарко, А. Н. (2020). Социальный капитал и экономические установки российских студентов. Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Психология и педагогика, 17(2), 243–260. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1683-2020-17-2-243-260

Tatarko, A. N. (2020). Social capital and economic attitudes among Russian students. RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics, 17(2), 243–260. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1683-2020-17-2-243-260 (In Russian)

Триандис, Х. (1995). Индивидуализм и коллективизм. Аспект-Пресс.

Triandis, H. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Aspekt-Press. (In Russian)

Хайдеггер, М. (1997). Бытие и время (В. В. Бибихин, пер.). Ad Marginem.

Heidegger, M. (1997). Being and time (V. V. Bibikhin, Trans.). Ad Marginem. (In Russian)

Berry, J. W., Poortinga, Y. H., Breugelmans, S. M., Chasiotis, A., & Sam, D. L. (2011). Cross-cultural psychology: Research and applications (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Cheng, L., Li, Z., Hao, M., Zhu, X., & Wang, F. (2022). Objectification limits authenticity: Exploring the relations between objectification, perceived authenticity, and subjective well-being. British Journal of Social Psychology, 61(2), 622–643. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12509

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Heine, S. J., & Hamamura, T. (2007). In search of East Asian self-enhancement. Personality and So-cial Psychology Review, 11(1), 4–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868306297299

Kernis, M. H., & Goldman, B. M. (2006). A multicomponent conceptualization of authenticity: Theo-ry and research. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, (38), 283–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(06)38006-9

Kito, M. (2005). Self-disclosure in romantic relationships and friendships among American and Japa-nese college students. The Journal of Social Psychology, 145(2), 127–140. https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.145.2.127-140

Nartova-Bochaver, S., Reznichenko, S., & Maltby, J. (2021). The authenticity scale: Validation in Russian culture. Frontiers in Psychology, (11), Article 609617. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.609617

Reznichenko, S. I., Nartova-Bochaver, S. K., & Irkhin, B. D. (2021). Do authentic people care about the environment? A view from two paradigms. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 14(3), 81–102. https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2021.0306

Robinson, O. C., Lopez, F. G., Ramos, K., & Nartova-Bochaver, S. (2013). Authenticity, social con-text, and well-being in the United States, England, and Russia: A three-country comparative analy-sis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44(5), 719–737. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022112465672

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motiva-tion, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

Ryan, W. S., & Ryan, R. M. (2019). Toward a social psychology of authenticity: Exploring within-person variation in autonomy, congruence, and genuineness. In A. DeCoster & S. J. Pittman (Eds.), Self and social identity (pp. 27–51). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429494998-2

Sedikides, C., Slabu, L., Lenton, A. P., & Thomaes, S. (2017). State authenticity as fit to environ-ment: How authentic states enhance subjective authenticity and adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(5), 684–699. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000100

Soler-Anguiano, F. L., Rivera-Aragón, S., & Díaz-Loving, R. (2023). Cross-cultural measurement invariance evidence of individualism and collectivism: From the idiosyncratic to universal. Fron-tiers in Psychology, (14), Article 1163349. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1163349

Song, J., Zheng, Y., Liu, X., & Wei, L. (2022). The effects of traditional concepts on personal values: The case of Chinese young adults. Frontiers in Psychology, (13), Article 872768. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.872768

Triandis, H. C. (2001). Dimensions of cultural variation as parameters of organizational cultures. In-ternational Studies of Management & Organization, 31(4), 139–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/00208825.2001.11656799

Triandis, H. C., & Gelfand, M. J. (1998). Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individ-ualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(1), 118–128. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.1.118

Wood, A. M., Linley, P. A., Maltby, J., Baliousis, M., & Joseph, S. (2008). The authentic living scale: A self-report measure of authenticity. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 55(3), 385–399. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.55.3.385

Yuan, Y., Du, J., Yang, K., Ge, Y., Ma, Y., Mao, H., Xiang, M., & Wu, D. (2024). Relationship be-tween horizontal collectivism and social network influence among college students: Mediating ef-fect of self-monitoring and moderating effect of self-efficacy. Frontiers in Psychology, (15), Arti-cle 1424223. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1424223

Published

2026-09-09

Issue

Section

Experimental and empirical research

How to Cite

Gerts, A. (2026). Personality authenticity in a cultural coordinate system: A preliminary study in Russia and Uzbekistan. Psychological Studies, 19(108), 6. https://doi.org/10.54359/ps.v19i108.2213