Оценка однофакторной и двухфакторной структуры русскоязычной версии Краткой шкалы резилентности: реплицирующее исследование на студенческой выборке
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54359/ps.v19i107.2142Ключевые слова:
резилентность, краткая шкала резилентности (BRS), жизнестойкость, факторная структура, внутренняя согласованность, валидность, психометрические свойства, репликационное исследование, студенческая выборкаАннотация
В настоящее время увеличивается количество исследований в области изучения резилентности как черты личности. Рассмотрение данного личностного аспекта в России началось сравнительно недавно, и только в последнее время начали появляться инструменты для его изучения. Резилентность, как ключевой адаптационный ресурс, играет важную роль в преодолении стрессовых ситуаций, что особенно значимо для студентов, испытывающих высокие академические и социальные нагрузки. Актуальность исследования обусловлена необходимостью дополнительной проверки валидности и репликации психометрических свойств Краткой шкалы резилентности (BRS) в русскоязычной популяции. Цель работы — проверка психометрических свойств русскоязычной версии BRS на студенческой выборке, включая анализ факторной структуры (однофакторной и двухфакторной), внутренней согласованности и валидности, а также сопоставление с данными предыдущих исследований. В исследовании приняли участие 140 студентов (средний возраст — 20,7 лет, SD = 2,4; 86 % женщин) из различных вузов России (МГУ, МГППУ, СПбГУ и др.). Данные собирались онлайн (Google Forms, апрель-май 2025 г.). Для анализа данных были применены следующие методы: моделирование структурными уравнениями (SEM), оценка надежности с помощью коэффициента внутренней согласованности Кронбаха и МакДональда, а также корреляционный анализ (коэффициенты Пирсона и Спирмена). Результаты подтвердили отличное соответствие двухфакторной и однофакторной моделей, что позволяет использовать обе структуры; высокую внутреннюю согласованность = 0,872, = 0,874 (однофакторная и двухфакторная модели); конвергентную валидность, подтвержденную значимыми корреляциями с жизнестойкостью, оптимизмом и активностью. Таким образом, русскоязычная BRS демонстрирует устойчивые психометрические характеристики, согласующиеся с оригинальной и адаптированной версиями. Результаты подчеркивают важность репликационных исследований для верификации методик и расширения их применения. BRS может быть рекомендована для оценки резилентности в научных и прикладных целях, включая мониторинг психологического благополучия студентов и разработку интервенций.
Скачивания
Библиографические ссылки
Ahern N.R., Kiehl E.M., Lou Sole M., Byers J. A review of instruments measuring resilience. Issues in Comprehensive Pediatric Nursing, 2006, No. 29(2), 103–125.
Almeida D.M., Wethington E., Kessler R.C. The Daily Inventory of Stressful Experiences (DISE): An interview-based approach for measuring daily stressors. Assessment, 2002, No. 9(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191102091001005
Anvari F., Alsalti T., Oehler L.A., Marion Z., Hussey I., Elson M., Arslan R.C. A fragmented field: Construct and measure proliferation in psychology. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psycho-logical Science, 2025, No. 8(3), https://doi.org/25152459251360642.
Baattaiah B.A., Alharbi M.D., Khan F., Aldhahi M.I. Translation and population-based validation of the Arabic version of the brief resilience scale. Annals of medicine, 2023, No. 55(1), 2230887. https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2023.2230887
Bonanno G.A. Loss, trauma, and human resilience: Have we underestimated the human capacity to thrive after extremely adverse events? American Psychologist, 2004, No. 59(1), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.20
Brown S.D. On statistical wizardry, construct proliferation, and other challenges for our science. The Counseling Psychologist, 2015, No. 43(4), 614–628. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000015578290
Castro C.A., Adler A.B. Military mental health training: Building resilience. // In: Resilience and Mental Health: Challenges Across the Lifespan. — Cambridge University Press, 2011. — 323–339.
Chmitorz A., Wenzel M., Stieglitz R.D., Kunzler A., Bagusat C., Helmreich I., Tüscher O. Popula-tion-based validation of a German version of the Brief Resilience Scale. PloS one, 2018, No. 13(2), e0192761. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192761
Cohen J. A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 1992, No. 112(1), 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
Crăciun A. Defining resilience as a concept since its first use in psychology. Romanian journal of ex-perimental applied psychology, 2013, No. 4(4), 73–82.
De Holanda Coelho G.L., Hanel P.H., Medeiros Cavalcanti T., Teixeira Rezende A., Veloso Gouveia V. Brief Resilience Scale: Testing its factorial structure and invariance in Brazil. Universitas Psycho-logica, 2016, No. 15(2), 397–408.
Dennis J., Vander Wal J. S. The Cognitive Flexibility Inventory: Instrument development and esti-mates of reliability and validity. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 2010, No. 34(3), 241–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-009-9276-4
DiStefano C., Liu J., Jiang N., Shi D. Examination of the Weighted Root Mean Square Residual: Evi-dence for Trustworthiness? Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2017, No. 25(3), 453–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2017.1390394
Donnellan B.M., Robins R. Resilient, Overcontrolled, and Undercontrolled Personality Types: Issues and Controversies. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2010, No. 4(11), 1070–1083. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00313.x
Dunn T.J., Baguley T., Brunsden V. From alpha to omega: a practical solution to the pervasive prob-lem of internal consistency estimation. British Journal of Psychology, 2014, No. 105(3), 399–412. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12046
Epskamp S., Cramer A.O., Waldorp L.J., Schmittmann V.D., Borsboom D. qgraph: Network Visual-izations of Relationships in Psychometric Data. Journal of Statistical Software, 2012, No. 48(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i04
Fletcher D., Sarkar M. Psychological resilience: A review and critique of definitions, concepts, and theory. European Psychologist, 2013, No. 18(1), 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000124
Friborg O., Hjemdal O., Rosenvinge J. H., Martinussen M. A new rating scale for adult resilience: what are the central protective resources behind healthy adjustment? International journal of methods in psychiatric research, 2003, No. 12(2), 65–76.
Fung S.F. Validity of the brief resilience scale and brief resilient coping scale in a Chinese sample. International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020, No. 17(4), 1265. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041265
Hagger M.S., Gucciardi, D.F., Chatzisarantis, N.L. On nomological validity and auxiliary assump-tions: The importance of simultaneously testing effects in social cognitive theories applied to health behavior and some guidelines. Frontiers in psychology, 2017, No. 8, 1933. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01933
Hu L., Bentler P.M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional crite-ria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 1999, No. 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Jacobs I., Horsch A. Psychometric properties of the French brief resilience scale. European Journal of Health Psychology, 2019, No. 21(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1027/2512-8442/a000022
Kim J., Jeong H.G., Lee M.S., Lee S.H., Jeon S.W., Han C. Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the brief resilience scale. Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience, 2023, No. 21(4), 732.
Kline R.B. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, 5th ed. — New York: Guilford Publications, 2023. — 534 рр.
Konaszewski K., Niesiobędzka M., Surzykiewicz J. Validation of the Polish version of the Brief Re-silience Scale (BRS). PloS one, 2020, No. 15(8), e0237038. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244895
Kurginian S.S., Osaiuk E.Yu. Oprosnik kognitivnoi fleksibilnosti (CFI): adaptatsiia narusskoiazych-noi vyborke [The Cognitive Flexibility Inventory (CFI): adaptation on a Russian-speaking sample]. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal, 2018, No. 39(2), 105–119. (In Russian) https://doi.org/10.7868/S0205959218020101
Lim W.M. A typology of validity: content, face, convergent, discriminant, nomological and predictive validity. Journal of Trade Science, 2024, No. 12(3), 155–179. https://doi.org/10.1108/JTS-03-2024-0016
Leonova Yu. I. Modeli rezilentnosti: sistematicheskii literaturnyi obzor [Resilience models: a system-atic literature review] // Materialy konferentsii «Lomonosov 2025». Sektsiia: «Psikhicheskoe zdorovie v meniaiushchemsia mire» [Proceedings of the conference Lomonosov 2025. Section: Mental health in a changing world], 2025. (In Russian)
Luthar S.S., Cicchetti D., Becker B.E. The Construct of Resilience: A Critical Evaluation and Guide-lines for Future Work. Child Development, 2000, No. 71(3), 543–562. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00164
Macovei C. M. The Brief Resilience scale-a Romanian-language adaptation. Agora Psycho-Pragmatica, 2015, No. 9(1), 70–87.
Maddi S.R., Brow M., Khoshaba D.M., Vaitkus M. Personal Views Survey, Revised. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 2001, No. 53.
Malapane T.A., Ndlovu N.K. Assessing the reliability of Likert scale statements in an e-commerce quantitative study: A Cronbach alpha analysis using SPSS Statistics. // 2024 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS), 2024, 90–95. https://doi.org/10.1109/SIEDS61124.2024.10534753
Markova V.I., Aleksandrova L.A., Zolotareva A.A. Adaptatsiia kratkoi shkaly rezilentnosti (BRS) na russkoiazychnoi vyborke [Adaptation of the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) on a Russian-speaking sample]. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal, 2022, No. 43(2), 45–58. (In Russian) https://doi.org/10.11621/npj.2022.0106
Masten A.S. Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development. American Psychologist, 2001, No. 56(3), 227–238. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.227
Mejia-Lancheros C., Woodhall-Melnik J., Wang R., Hwang S.W., Stergiopoulos V., Durbin A. As-sociations of resilience with quality-of-life levels in adults experiencing homelessness and mental ill-ness: a longitudinal study. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2021, No. 19(1), 74. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-021-01713-z
Mueller R.O., Hancock G.R. Structural equation modeling. // The Reviewer & Guide to Quantitative Methods in the Social Sciences, 2nd ed. — New York: Routledge, 2018. — 445–456.
Narayanan A. Ego-resiliency, Probabilistic Orientation and Self-efficacy. The Recent Trends in Psy-chology, 2020, 17–31.
Osin E.N. Faktornaia struktura kratkoi versii Testa zhiznestoikosti. [The factor structure of the short version of the Hardiness Test]. Organizatsionnaia psikhologiia, 2013, No. 3(3), 42–60. (In Russian)
Prion S., Haerling K.A. Making sense of methods and measurement: Spearman-rho ranked-order cor-relation coefficient. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 2014, No. 10(10), 535–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2014.07.005
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. — Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2021. — URL: https://cran.r-project.org (accessed: 01.07.2025)
Revelle W. psych: Procedures for Personality and Psychological Research. [R package], 2024. — URL: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych (accessed: 01.07.2025)
Rhemtulla M., Brosseau-Liard É., Savalei V. When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal condi-tions. Psychological Methods, 2012, No. 17(3), 354–373. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029315
Richardson G.E. The metatheory of resilience and resiliency. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2002, No. 58(3) 307–321. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.10020
Rodríguez-Rey R., Alonso-Tapia J., Hernansaiz-Garrido H. Reliability and validity of the Brief Resil-ience Scale (BRS) Spanish Version. Psychological Assessment, 2016, No. 28(3), e101–e110. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000191
Sánchez J., Estrada-Hernández N., Booth J., Pan D. Factor structure, internal reliability, and construct validity of the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS): A study on persons with serious mental illness living in the community. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 2021, No. 94(3), 620–645. https://doi.org/10.1111/papt.12336
Sánchez M.L., Malaver M.J., Peñate W. Resilience and emotional regulation: A cross-cultural study with BRS. Frontiers in Psychology, 2021, No. 12, 654321. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.654321
Sánchez-Teruel D., Robles-Bello M.A., Muela-Martínez J.A., García-León A. Resilience Assessment Scale for the prediction of suicide reattempt in clinical population. Frontiers in Psychology, 2021, No. 12, 673088. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.673088
Schuller I., Comunian A. Cross-Cultural Comparison of Arousability and Optimism Scale (AOS). // 18th International Conference of Stress and Anxiety Research Society, 1997.
Seol H. seolmatrix: Correlations suite for Jamovi. Version 3.7.1, 2023. — URL: https://github.com/hyunsooseol/seolmatrix (accessed: 02.07.2025)
Smith B.W., Dalen J., Wiggins K., Tooley E., Christopher P., Bernard J. The Brief Resilience Scale: Assessing the ability to bounce back. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 2008, No. 15(3), 194–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705500802222972
Southwick S.M., Bonanno G.A., Masten A.S., Panter-Brick C., Yehuda R. Resilience definitions, theory, and challenges: interdisciplinary perspectives. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 2014, No. 5(1), 25338. https://doi.org/10.3402/ejpt.v5.25338
Tedeschi R.G., Calhoun L.G. Posttraumatic growth: conceptual foundations and empirical evidence. Psychological Inquiry, 2004, No. 15(1), 1–18.
The Jamovi project. Jamovi. Version 2.3, 2022. — URL: https://www.jamovi.org (accessed: 01.07.2025)
Ungar M., Russell P., Connelly G. School-based interventions to enhance the resilience of students. Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 2014, No. 4(1), 66–83. https://doi.org/10.5539/jedp.v4n1p66
Vodopianova N.E. Psikhodiagnostika stressa [Psychodiagnostics of Stress]. — Moscow: Piter, 2009. — 336 рр. (In Russian)
Windle G., Bennett K.M., Noyes J.A methodological review of resilience measurement scales. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2011, No. 9, 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-9-8
Wu Y., Sang Z., Zhang X.C., Margraf J. The relationship between resilience and mental health in Chinese college students: a longitudinal cross-lagged analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 2020, No. 11, 108. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00108
Yaroshchuk I.V. Psikhologiia zhiznestoikosti: obzor teoreticheskikh kontseptsii, empiricheskikh is-sledovanii i metodik diagnostiki [Psychology of Hardiness: a review of theoretical concepts, empirical research and diagnostic methods]. Uchenye zapiski SPbGIPSR, 2020, No. 33(1), 50–61. (In Rus-sian)
Ye Y.C., Wu C.H., Huang T.Y., Yang C.T. The difference between the Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale and the Brief Resilience Scale when assessing resilience: confirmatory factor analysis and pre-dictive effects. Global Mental Health, 2022, No. 9, 339–346. https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2022.38
Zhong S., Clark M., Hou X.Y., Zang Y., FitzGerald G. Development of key indicators of hospital resilience: a modified Delphi study. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 2015, No. 20(2), 74–82.
Zhou Z., Ma Z. Evaluating the Brief Resilience Scale in 21 Countries: Psychometric Properties and Measurement Invariance Across Sex, Age, and Countries. Assessment, 2025, https://doi.org/10731911251355124.
Zolkoski S.M., Bullock L.M. Resilience in children and youth: A review. Children and Youth Ser-vices Review, 2012, No. 34(12), 2295–2303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.08.009
Загрузки
Опубликован
Выпуск
Раздел
Лицензия
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution-NonCommercial» («Атрибуция — Некоммерческое использование») 4.0 Всемирная.
