Проэкологическое поведение в России: адаптация шкалы Кэмерона Брика и связь с экологической обеспокоенностью

Авторы

  • Александра Иванова
  • Фатиха Агисова
  • Елена Сауткина

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54359/ps.v13i70.199

Ключевые слова:

проэкологическое поведение, экологическая обеспокоенность, изменение климата, психология среды, адаптация

Аннотация

В условиях стремительного ухудшения состояния окружающей среды и изменения климата, вызванных антропогенным воздействием, все большую актуальность приобретают исследования проэкологического поведения. Проэкологическим считается поведение, направленное на снижение вреда, наносимого окружающей среде, или же оказывающее на нее благоприятное воздействие. Мы провели адаптацию шкалы проэкологического поведения К.Брика (2017) и исследовали ее связь с экологической обеспокоенностью в России.

Скачивания

Данные скачивания пока недоступны.

Биографии авторов

Александра Иванова

Иванова Александра Андреевна. Студент магистратуры, научный ассистент, департамент психологии, Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики», Армянский пер., д. 4, с. 2, 10100 Москва, Россия. E-mail: aaivanova_24@edu.hse.ru

Фатиха Агисова

Агисова Фатиха Багдатовна. Студент магистратуры, научный ассистент, департамент психологии, Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики», Армянский пер., д. 4, с. 2, 10100 Москва, Россия. E-mail: fagisova@edu.hse.ru

Елена Сауткина

Сауткина Елена Владимировна. PhD, профессор, департамент психологии, Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики», Армянский пер., д. 4, с. 2, 10100 Москва, Россия. E-mail: esautkina@hse.ru

Библиографические ссылки

Cyrillic letters are transliterated according to BSI standards. The titles are given in author’s translation.

Alekseeva N.N., Arshinova M.A., Bancheva A.I. Polozhenie Rossii v mezhdunarodnyh ekologicheskih rejtingah. Vestnik RUDN. Seriya: Ekologiya i bezopasnost' zhiznedeyatel'nosti, 2018, 26(1), 134–152. (in Russian)

Berenguer J., Corraliza J.A., Martín R. Rural-urban differences in environmental concern, attitudes, and actions. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 2005, 21(2), 128–138.

Biesbroek R., Klostermann J., Termeer C., Kabat P. Barriers to climate change adaptation in the Netherlands. Climate Law, 2011, 2, 181–199.

Brick C., Lai C.K. Explicit (but not implicit) environmentalist identity predicts pro-environmental behavior and policy preferences. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2018, 58, 8–17.

Brick C., Sherman D.K., Kim H.S. “Green to be seen” and “brown to keep down”: Visibility moderates the effect of identity on pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2017, 51, 226–238.

Clayton S., Devine-Wright P., Swim J., Bonnes M., Steg L., Whitmarsh L., Carrico A. Expanding the role for psychology in addressing environmental challenges. American Psychologist, 2016, 71(3), 199–215.

Clayton S., Irkhin B.D., Nartova-Bochaver S.K. Environmental Identity in Russia: Validation and Relationship to Concern for People and Plants. Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 2019, 16(1), 85–107.

Farrow K., Grolleau G., Ibanez L. Social Norms and Pro-environmental Behavior: A Review of the Evidence. Ecological Economics, 2017, 140, 1–13.

Gardner G.T., Stern P.C. The short list: The most effective actions U.S. households can take to curb climate change. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 2008, 50(5), 12–25.

Gatersleben B. Measuring Environmental Behaviour. In: L. Steg, J. de Groot (Eds.) Environmental Psychology: An Introduction, Second Edition. Wiley Online Library, 2019, 158–166.

Gifford R., Nilsson A. Personal and social factors that influence pro‐environmental concern and behaviour: A review. International Journal of Psychology, 2014, 49(3), 141–157.

Hornsey M.J., Harris E.A., Bain P.G., Fielding K.S. Meta-analyses of the determinants and outcomes of belief in climate change. Nature Climate Change, 2016, 6(6), 622–626.

Hu L.T., Bentler P.M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 1999. 6(1). 1–55.

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2014.

Kaiser F.G., Wilson M. Goal-directed conservation behavior: The specific composition of a general performance. Personality and individual differences, 2004, 36(7), 1531–1544.

Kryazh I.V., Klimkina Yu.V. Ekologicheskaya ozabochennost' i gotovnost' k ekosberegayushchemu povedeniyu u studentov raznyh special'nostej. Vіsnik Harkіvs'kogo nacіonal'nogo unіversitetu іmenі V.N. Karazіna, 2013, Serіya: «Psihologіya», 1065(52), 33–37. (in Ukrainian)

Lacroix K. Comparing the relative mitigation potential of individual pro-environmental behaviors. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 195, 1398–1407.

Landry N., Gifford R., Milfont T.L., Weeks A., Arnocky S. Learned helplessness moderates the relationship between environmental concern and behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2018, 55, 18–22.

Lange F., Dewitte S. Measuring pro-environmental behavior: Review and recommendations. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2019, 63, 92–100.

Larson L.R., Stedman R.C., Cooper C.B., Decker D.J. Understanding the multi-dimensional structure of pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2015, 43, 112–124.

Lee T.M., Markowitz E.M., Howe P.D., Ko C.Y., Leiserowitz A.A. Predictors of public climate change awareness and risk perception around the world. Nature Climate Change, 2015, 5(11), 1014–1020.

Minprirody Rossii. Gosudarstvennyj doklad “O sostoyanii i ob ohrane okruzhayushchej sredy Rossijskoj Federacii v 2017 godu” M.: Minprirody Rossii, NPP Kadastr, 2018. (in Russian)

Nash N., Whitmarsh L., Capstick S., Hargreaves T., Poortinga W., Thomas G., Sautkina E., Xenias D. Climate-relevant behavioral spillover and the potential contribution of social practice theory. WIREs Climate Change, 2017, 8(6), 1–16.

Nestik T.A., Zhuravlev A.L. Psihologiya global'nyh riskov. M.: Institut psihologii RAN, 2018, 402. (in Russian)

Nielsen K.S., Clayton S., Stern P.C., Dietz T., Capstick S., Whitmarsh L. How psychology can help limit climate change. American Psychologist, Advance online publication, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000624

Panov V.I. Ekologicheskoe soznanie v paradigmal'nom kontekste ponyatiya “Priroda”. Noosfernye issledovaniya, 2017, 2(18), 17–30. (in Russian)

Poortinga W., Steg L., Vlek C. Values, environmental concern, and environmental behavior: A study into household energy use. Environment and Behavior, 2004, 36(1), 70–93.

Rosgidromet. Vtoroj ocenochnyj doklad Rosgidrometa ob izmeneniyah klimata i ih posledstviyah na territorii Rossijskoj Federacii. M.: Rosgidromet, 2014. (in Russian)

Sautkina E., Ivanova A. The drivers of pro-environmental behaviour in Russia. Proceedings of the International Conference of Environmental Psychology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK, 2019.

Sautkina E. Social'no-psihologicheskij analiz ekologicheskoj kul'tury i ekologicheskoj politiki v Rossii v usloviyah uhudshayushchegosya kachestva okruzhayushchej sredy. V kn.: K.G. Byonke, N.M. Lebedeva (Red.), Social'no-psihologicheskie posledstviya izmenenij na postsovetskom prostranstve: kross-kul'turnyj i kross-regional'nyj analiz. Moskva: Mezhdunarodnaya laboratoriya socio-kul'turnyh issledovanij NIU VSHE, 2019. (in Russian)

Steg L., Bolderdijk J.W., Keizer K., Perlaviciute G. An integrated framework for encouraging proenvironmental behaviour: The role of values, situational factors and goals. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2014, 30, 104–115.

Steg L., Vlek C. Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2009, 29(3), 309–317.

Van der Werff E., Steg L., Keizer K. The value of environmental selfidentity: the relationship between biospheric values, environmental selfidentity and environmental preferences, intentions and behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2013, 34, 55–63.

Whitmarsh L., O'Neill S. Green identity, green living? The role of pro-environmental self-identity in determining consistency across diverse pro-environmental behaviours. Journal of environmental psychology, 2010, 30(3), 305–314.

Опубликован

26.05.2020

Как цитировать

Иванова, А., Агисова, Ф., & Сауткина, Е. (2020). Проэкологическое поведение в России: адаптация шкалы Кэмерона Брика и связь с экологической обеспокоенностью. Психологические исследования, 13(70). https://doi.org/10.54359/ps.v13i70.199

Выпуск

Раздел

Статьи