Индивидуально-интеллектуальные двойные системы у студентов
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54359/ps.v16i88.1379Ключевые слова:
индивидуально-интеллектуальные двойные системы, интегральная индивидуальность, интеллект, креативность, интерактивная модель, интегративная модельАннотация
Ставятся и решаются задачи изучить некоторые особенности индивидуально-интеллектуальных двойных систем у студентов, в их рамках тестировать модели взаимодействия и интеграции. Двойные системы рассматриваются на примере свойств интегральной индивидуальности (Система 1) и интеллекта с креативным мышлением (Система 2). В исследовании приняли участие 416 студентов вузов г. Перми: 294 девушки и 122 юноши. Тестировались четыре гипотезы, все они получили эмпирическую поддержку. Было выявлено, что не все свойства одной системы интегрируются со всеми свойствами другой системы. Их интеграция происходит избирательно. Вероятно, при взаимодействии систем только некоторые их свойства обладают интегративным потенциалом.
Скачивания
Библиографические ссылки
Anan'ev B.G. Chelovek kak predmet poznaniya. Saint Petersburg: Piter, 2001. (in Russian)
Averina I.S., Shcheblanova E.I. Verbal'nyi test tvorcheskogo myshleniya “Neobychnoe ispol'zovanie”. Moscow: Sobor", 1996. (in Russian)
Baturin N.A., Kurganskii N.A. Kratkoe rukovodstvo po Universal'nomu intellektual'nomu testu (UIT SPCh): Chelyabinsk – Sankt-Peterburg. Saint Petersburg, 1995. (in Russian)
Brushlinskii A.V. Psikhologiya sub"ekta. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2003. (in Russian)
Danilova N.P., Shmelev A.G. Test-oprosnik Strelyau. V kn.: Praktikum po psikhodiagnostike. Mos-cow: Izd-vo MGU, 1988. P. 4–10. (in Russian)
Dorfman L.Ya. Empiricheskaya paradigma v psikhologicheskoi nauke. V kn.: A.L. Zhuravlev, T.V. Kornilova, A.V. Yurevich (red.), Paradigmy v psikhologii: naukovedcheskii analiz. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2012. P. 335−379. (in Russian)
Dorfman L.Ya. Kauzal'nyi plyuralizm i kholizm v kontseptsii metaindividual'nogo mira. Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki, 2016, 13(1), 98–153. (in Russian)
Dorfman L.Ya. Metaindividual'naya i polimodal'naya modeli kreativnosti. V kn.: V.M. Petrov, A.V. Kharuto (red.), Informatsiya, vremya, tvorchestvo. Moscow: Gosudarstvennyi institut iskusstvoz-naniya; Moskovskaya gosudarstvennaya konservatoriya im. P.I. Chaikovskogo, 2007. P. 73–79. (in Russian)
Dorfman L.Ya., Kalugin A.Yu. Chetyrekhfaktornyi oprosnik Ya: ego kontseptual'nyi i psikhometrich-eskii analiz. Sibirskii psikhologicheskii zhurnal, 2020, 75, 53−74. (in Russian) doi:10.17223/17267080/75/4
Dorfman L.Ya., Kalugin A.Yu. Individual'no-intellektual'nye integratsii cheloveka. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2021. (in Russian) doi:10.38098/mng_21_0438
Dorfman L.Ya., Kalugin A.Yu. Obshchie i diskriminantnye peremennye Ya-kontseptsii. Integrativna-ya perspektiva v gumanitarnykh naukakh, 2016, 1, 51−68. (in Russian)
Dorfman L.Ya., Lyadov V.N. Metaindividual'naya model' distsiplinirovannosti (na materiale issledo-vaniya kursantov voennogo vuza MVD). Vestnik Yuzhno-Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Psikhologiya, 2015, 8(1), 17−28. (in Russian)
Dorfman L.Ya., Tokareva G.V. Emotsional'nye predpochteniya i polimodal'noe Ya muzykanta-ispolnitelya. Filologiya i kul'tura, 2013, 1(31), 235−241. (in Russian)
Kalugin A.Yu., Shchebetenko S.A., Mishkevich A.M., Soto K.Dzh., Dzhon O.P. Psikhometrika russ-koyazychnoi versii Big Five Inventory – 2. Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki, 2021, 18(1), 7–33. (in Russian) doi:10.17323/1813-8918-2021-1-7-33
Kholodnaya M.A. Intellekt, kreativnost', obuchaemost': resursnyi podkhod (o razvitii idei V. N. Dru-zhinina). Psikhologicheskii zhurnal, 2015, 36(5), 5–14. (in Russian)
Kuz'min V.P. Istoricheskie predposylki i gnoseologicheskie osnovaniya sistemnogo podkhoda. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal, 1982, 3(3), 3−14. (in Russian)
Leont'ev A.N. Potrebnosti, motivy i emotsii. Moscow: Izd-vo MGU, 1971. (in Russian)
Lomov B.F. Metodologicheskie i teoreticheskie problemy psikhologii. Moscow: Nauka, 1984. (in Russian)
Merlin V.S. Lektsii po psikhologii motivov cheloveka: Perm': PGPI, 1971. (in Russian)
Merlin V.S. Ocherk integral'nogo issledovaniya individual'nosti. Moscow: Pedagogika, 1986. (in Russian)
Nasledov A.D. IBM SPSS Statistics 20 i AMOS: professional'nyi statisticheskii analiz dannykh. Saint Petersburg: Piter, 2013. (in Russian)
Palei I.M. K differentsial'no-psikhologicheskomu issledovaniyu studentov v svyazi s zadachami izucheniya potentsialov razvitiya vzroslogo cheloveka. V kn.: Sovremennye psikhologo-pedagogicheskie problemy vysshei shkoly. Leningrad, 1974, 2. P. 133−143. (in Russian)
Ponomarev Ya.A. Metodologicheskoe vvedenie v psikhologiyu. Moscow: Nauka, 1983. (in Russian)
Raven J.C., Court J.H., Raven J.E. Rukovodstvo k progressivnym matritsam Ravena i slovarnym shkalam. Razd. 1. Obshchaya chast' rukovodstva. Moscow: Kogito-Tsentr, 1997. (in Russian)
Rusalov V.M. Temperament v strukture individual'nosti cheloveka. Differentsial'no-psikhofiziologicheskie i psikhologicheskie issledovaniya. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2012. (in Russian)
Rusalov V.M., Dudin S.I. Temperament i intellekt: obshchie i spetsial'nye faktory razvitiya. Psikho-logicheskii zhurnal, 1995, 16(5), 12−23. (in Russian)
Sheptulin A.P. Dialektika edinichnogo, osobennogo i obshchego. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola, 1973. (in Russian)
Stern W. Differentsial'naya psikhologiya i ee metodicheskie osnovy. Moscow: Nauka, 1998. (in Rus-sian)
Strelyau Ya., Mitina O., Zavadskii B., Babaeva Yu., Menchuk T. Metodika diagnostiki temperamenta (formal'no-dinamicheskikh kharakteristik povedeniya). Moscow: Smysl, 2009. (in Russian)
Ushakov D.V. Anatomiya psikhologicheskogo znaniya. V kn.: A.L. Zhuravleva, A.V. Yurevicha (red.), Psikhologicheskoe znanie: Sovremennoe sostoyanie i perspektivy razvitiya. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2018. P. 71–114. (in Russian)
Ushakov D.V. Intellekt: strukturno-dinamicheskaya teoriya. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2003. (in Russian)
Ushakov D.V. Na puti k tselostnomu videniyu cheloveka. Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki, 2020, 17(4), 617–629. (in Russian) doi:10.17323/1813-8918-2020-4-617-629
Volkova E.V. Tekhnologii razvitiya mental'nykh resursov. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2016. (in Russian)
Vyatkin B.A., Dorfman L.Ya. Sistemnaya integratsiya individual'nosti cheloveka. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2018. (in Russian)
Vyatkin B.A., Dorfman L.Ya., Kalugin A.Yu. Obshchee i razlichiya v tsennostnykh orientatsiyakh i psikhodinamike studentov: integrativnaya model'. Soobshchenie 2. Rezul'taty empiricheskogo issle-dovaniya. Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Seriya Filosofiya. Psikhologiya. Pedagogika, 2018a, 28(2), 173−181. (in Russian)
Vyatkin B.A., Dorfman L.Ya., Kalugin A.Yu. Obshchee i razlichiya v tsennostnykh orientatsiyakh i psikhodinamike studentov: integrativnaya model'. Soobshchenie 1. Predposylki issledovaniya. Vest-nik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Seriya Filosofiya. Psikhologiya. Pedagogika, 2018b, 28(1), 42−50. (in Russian)
Vyatkin B.A., Shchukin M.R. Ob integratsii teorii i podkhodov tselostnogo poznaniya cheloveka. Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Seriya Filosofiya. Psikhologiya. Pedagogika, 2016, 26(2), 47–57. (in Russian)
Zhamkoch'yan M.S. Vzaimosvyazi nekotorykh kharakteristik aktivirovannosti, intellekta i lichnosti v strukture individual'nosti. V kn.: Problemy integral'nogo issledovaniya individual'nosti. Perm', 1978, 2. P. 125–139. (in Russian)
Awang Z. Structural equation modeling using AMOS graphic. Penerbit Universiti Teknologi MARA Press, Malaysia, 2012.
Barbey A.K., Sloman S.A. Base-rate respect: From ecological rationality to dual processes. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2007, 30(3), 241–297. doi:10.1017/s0140525x07001653
Barr N. Intuition, reason, and creativity: An integrative dual-process perspective. In: G. Pennycook (Ed.), The new reflectionism in cognitive psychology: why reason matters. Current Issues in Thinking and Reasoning Series. Routledge, 2018. pp. 99–124.
Brown T. Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, London: The Guilford Press, 2015.
Byrne B.M. A primer of LISREL. New York: Springer Verlag, 1989. doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-8885-2
Calvin C.M., Batty G.D., Deary I.J. Cognitive epidemiology: Concepts, evidence, and future direc-tions. In: T. Chamorro-Premuzic, S. von Stumm, A. Furnham (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of individual differences. Wiley Blackwell, 2011. pp. 427–460.
Chamorro-Premuzic T., Reichenbacher L. Effects of personality and threat of evaluation on divergent and convergent thinking. Journal of Research in Personality, 2008, 42(4), 1095–1101. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2007.12.007
Deutsch R., Strack F. Duality models in social psychology: From dual processes to interacting sys-tems. Psychological Inquiry, 2006, 17(3), 166–172. doi:10.1207/s15327965pli1703_2
Dhar R, Gorlin M. A dual-system framework to understand preference construction processes in choice. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2013, 23(4), 528–542. doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2013.02.002
Dorfman L., Kalugin A. Individual intellectual integration in Russian students. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2022.
Evans J.S. Dual process theories of deductive reasoning: facts and fallacies. In: The Oxford Hand-book of Thinking and Reasoning, 2012. pp. 115–133.
Evans J.S.B.T., Stanovich K.E. Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition: Advancing the Debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 2013a, 8(3), 223–241. doi:10.1177/1745691612460685
Evans J.S.B.T., Stanovich K.E. Theory and metatheory in the study of dual processing: Reply to comments. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2013b, 8(3), 263–271. doi:10.1177/1745691613483774
Gatignon H. Statistical analysis of management data. 3rd edn. New York: Springer, 2014.
George D., Mallery P. IBM SPSS statistics. 23 step by step: A simple guide and reference. New York: Routledge, 2016.
Grayot J.D. Dual Process Theories in Behavioral Economics and Neuroeconomics: a Critical Review. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 2020, 11(1), 105–136. doi:10.1007/s13164-019-00446-9
Guilford J.P. Creativity. American Psychologist, 1950, 5(9), 444–454. doi:10.1037/h0063487
Guilford J.P. The nature of human intelligence. McGraw-Hill, 1967.
Guilford J.P. The structure of intellect. Psychological Bulletin, 1956, 53(4), 267–293. doi:10.1037/h0040755
Hogan R., Hogan J., Barrett P. Good judgment: The intersection of intelligence and personality. In: Ergonomics and Psychology. CRC Press, 2008. pp. 375–394.
Hunt E. Human Intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
James W. A pluralistic universe. Hibbert Lectures. University of Nebraska Press, 1909/1996.
Kahneman D. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar Straus and Giroux, 2011.
Lopata J.A., Barr N., Slayton M., Seli P. Dual-modes of creative thought in the classroom: Implica-tions of network neuroscience for creativity education. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 2022, 8(1), 79–89. doi:10.1037/tps0000317
Pennycook G. A perspective on the theoretical foundation of dual-process models. In: W. De Neys (Ed.), Dual process theory 2.0. Psychology Press, 2017.
Peters E. The functions of affect in the construction of preferences. In: S. Lichtenstein, P. Slovic (Eds.), The construction of preference. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2006. pp. 454–463.
Shchebetenko S., Kalugin A.Y., Mishkevich A.M., Soto C.J., John O.P. Measurement Invariance and Sex and Age Differences of the Big Five Inventory–2: Evidence From the Russian Version. Assess-ment, 2020, 27(3), 472–486. doi:10.1177/1073191119860901
Soto C.J., John O.P. The next Big Five Inventory (BFI-2): Developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power. Journal of personality and social psychology, 2017, 113(1), 117–143. doi:10.1037/pspp0000096
Spearman C. General intelligence, objectively determined and measured. American Journal of Psy-chology, 1904, 15, 201−293.
Stanovich W., West R. Individual difference in reason implications for the rationality debate? Behav-ioural and Brain Sciences, 2000, 23, 645–726.
Strelau J., Angleitner A., Newberry B.H. The Pavlovian temperament survey (PTS): an international handbook. Hogrefe & Huber Pub, 1999.
Strelau J., Zawadzki B. The formal characteristics of behavior – Temperament inventory (FCB–TI): Validity studies. European Journal of Personality, 1995, 9(3), 207–229.
Tsujii T., Watanabe S. Neural correlates of dual-task effect on belief-bias syllogistic reasoning: a near-infrared spectroscopy study. Brain Research, 2009, 1287, 118–125. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2009.06.08
Wallach M.A., Kogan N. Modes of thinking in young children. N.Y.: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1965.
Wiley J., Jarosz A.F. Working memory capacity, attentional focus, and problem solving. Current Di-rections in Psychological Science, 2012, 21(4), 258–262. doi:10.1177/0963721412447622
Загрузки
Опубликован
Выпуск
Раздел
Лицензия
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution-NonCommercial» («Атрибуция — Некоммерческое использование») 4.0 Всемирная.
