Neuroreductionism and the problem of the subject in cognitive research: a commentary on the translation of W. Wundt

Authors

  • Nikita Loginov

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54359/ps.v14i75.158

Abstract

The Wilhelm Wundt’s principal attitude on reductionism described in the “On mental causality and the prin-ciple of psychophysical parallelism” (1894) appears to be relevant within current debates on theoretical prin-ciples of psychological science. Wundt’s arguments updatedand modified in accordance with the present seem to be applicable in a few ways. First, his arguments are relevant in discussion with the neuroreductionism that substitutes psychological explanations with neuronal. Secondly, Wundt’s position is also relevant when con-sidering the liberal or humanitarian psychology, which opposes the psychological subject to the psyche. Both of the alternatives to traditional cognitive theoretical explanations turned out to be vulnerable to criticism, formulated more than 120 years ago.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Nikita Loginov
    Loginov Nikita I. PhD in Psychology, Associate Professor, Department of General Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Institute for Social Sciences, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Prospect Vernadskogo, 82, 119571 Moscow, Russia E-mail: lognikita@yandex.ru

Published

2021-03-04

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Loginov, N. (2021). Neuroreductionism and the problem of the subject in cognitive research: a commentary on the translation of W. Wundt. Psychological Studies, 14(75). https://doi.org/10.54359/ps.v14i75.158